<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is WIPO finished?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10050/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10050</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10050/comment-page-1#comment-127487</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-127487</guid>
		<description>I pesonally prefer the WIPO process to that of the bilateral arranagements that the US has been pushing for the past few years - as an Aussie about to suffer the increased expansion of anit-circumvention law - I have to say the process was largely conducted in secret, with the trade off in relation to other markets within the economy placing intellectual property in a precarious position - of course we&#039;ll succumb to US IP demands in exchange for agriculture. Part of the WIPO treaties should be that no other free trade negotiations are permitted to take place and the process should only be conducted within that forum.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pesonally prefer the WIPO process to that of the bilateral arranagements that the US has been pushing for the past few years &#8211; as an Aussie about to suffer the increased expansion of anit-circumvention law &#8211; I have to say the process was largely conducted in secret, with the trade off in relation to other markets within the economy placing intellectual property in a precarious position &#8211; of course we&#8217;ll succumb to US IP demands in exchange for agriculture. Part of the WIPO treaties should be that no other free trade negotiations are permitted to take place and the process should only be conducted within that forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10050/comment-page-1#comment-125519</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-125519</guid>
		<description>WIPO, does that stand for World Imperial Powers Organization?

Anyway, that is what it is.

The purpose? Shove down the throat of trhird world countries one sided traties through current corrupt leaders.

Because of of those treaties the copyright and papent based cash flow is in one direction, 9:1. 9 to the industrial countries and 1 to the third world.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIPO, does that stand for World Imperial Powers Organization?</p>
<p>Anyway, that is what it is.</p>
<p>The purpose? Shove down the throat of trhird world countries one sided traties through current corrupt leaders.</p>
<p>Because of of those treaties the copyright and papent based cash flow is in one direction, 9:1. 9 to the industrial countries and 1 to the third world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


