Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

RIAA MediaSentry controversy

p2pnet.net News:- The members of the Big Four Organized Music cartel say Brooklyn mother and home health aide Marie Lindor has been illegally distributing music online.

Lurking darkly in the background is the seriously discredited MediaSentry, a company which makes its money by claiming to be able to provide the equally discredited Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG, with information on alleged file sharers whom, assert the multi-bllion-dollar labels, are ruining them.

The Big Four, Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal, accused of price fixing and bribery in the US, claim every one of their hundreds of millions of customers, including children, is a potential “criminal” and “thief” bent on robbing the labels of what’s rightfully theirs.

Lindor says not only didn’t she distribute music online, she’s never even used a computer.

But the Big Four’s RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) implies she’s lying, basing its allegation partly or wholly on data supplied by MediaSentry.

In Canada, when the company was working for RIAA clone the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America), justice Konrad von Finckenstein was singularly and quotably unimpressed by MediaSentry ‘evidence’ and in Holland, the District Court of Utrecht decided MediaSentry’s investigation of p2p file sharing wasn’t only flawed, it was “unlawful”.

Now, Marie Lindor’s lawyers are in effect demanding that the RIAA put up or shut up, challenging its attempts to designate its contracts with MediaSentry as “privileged” under the doctrines of “attorney client privilege” and “work product privilege,” says Recording Industry vs The People.

What’s in the contracts? Why are the Big Four so strenuously trying to avoid public disclosure?

Stay tuned.

Also See:
seriously discredited MediaSentry - MediaSentry’s Dutch p2p foul-up, November 14, 2005
Recording Industry vs The People - RIAA’s Contention that its MediaSentry Agreements are “Privileged” is Challenged by Marie Lindor, October 22, 2006


p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.

rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy