Comments on: Canada, a haven for libel lawsuits

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:29:45 +0000

It is glaringly obvious, and I do hope the Sharman people are watching, that you mentioned the defence of the case having no merit rather than the defence which the innocent rely upon, that of fact. Good luck with that, another in a long series of defences test run on this site

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:56:51 +0000

“Hey John printing friendly opinions wont help you when you hit the witness box and prolduce your (lack) of evidence ”

Here is the publicly available Lawsuit documentation.

http://s22.quicksharing.com/v/3421267/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

Since Jon has been stifled by legal and financial bullying
and cannot speak in his own defense publicly ( while his
well monied detractors can lie at will online ) this document
provides all the info necessary to show EXACTLY what the
suit is … and isn’t .. about …

The truth. It can’t be silenced Gachnar.
In the long run, all of your bashing will come to nothing when
Nikki and crew hit the witness box and are unable to show any
merit to this suit.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:16:53 +0000

This is nothing but theory disconected from the real world being promoted by a wishful thinking editor who, it is loudly alleged, libelled someone.

Hey John printing friendly opinions wont help you when you hit the witness box and prolduce your (lack) of evidence