<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiny, new iPod shuffle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129685</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129685</guid>
		<description>Yes.  Yes they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Yes they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129650</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129650</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t own an ipod, but the statement that it only plays DRM songs is inaccurate. It seems simple to me, if you buy songs from itunes, you have to deal with drm, if you load it up with mp3&#039;s that you have ripped from cd or dl&#039;d from p2p, then you avoid apple&#039;s DRM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t own an ipod, but the statement that it only plays DRM songs is inaccurate. It seems simple to me, if you buy songs from itunes, you have to deal with drm, if you load it up with mp3&#8217;s that you have ripped from cd or dl&#8217;d from p2p, then you avoid apple&#8217;s DRM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129606</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129606</guid>
		<description>&quot; I&#039;d really love it if people would start to realise that there is infact more to a product than functionality. &quot;

 The weakest minded among of have been successfully programmed
via advertising to &#039;realize&#039; that image is MORE important than
functionality or quality.

&quot;The vast majority of SHEEPLE , if not all, are impacted hugely by brands or a product&#039;s general image. If they value this, then is there anything wrong paying more for it? &quot;

 Fixed it for ya :)
 
If you are willing to pay that much more, simply on the basis
of a name brand, then go for it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I&#8217;d really love it if people would start to realise that there is infact more to a product than functionality. &#8221;</p>
<p> The weakest minded among of have been successfully programmed<br />
via advertising to &#8216;realize&#8217; that image is MORE important than<br />
functionality or quality.</p>
<p>&#8220;The vast majority of SHEEPLE , if not all, are impacted hugely by brands or a product&#8217;s general image. If they value this, then is there anything wrong paying more for it? &#8221;</p>
<p> Fixed it for ya <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you are willing to pay that much more, simply on the basis<br />
of a name brand, then go for it <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129604</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129604</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d really love it if people would start to realise that there is infact more to a product than functionality. 

The vast majority of people, if not all, are impacted hugely by brands or a product&#039;s general image. If they value this, then is there anything wrong paying more for it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really love it if people would start to realise that there is infact more to a product than functionality. </p>
<p>The vast majority of people, if not all, are impacted hugely by brands or a product&#8217;s general image. If they value this, then is there anything wrong paying more for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129598</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129598</guid>
		<description>Yes, iPod is crap. All you pay for is the name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, iPod is crap. All you pay for is the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129592</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129592</guid>
		<description>&quot;You must think 60 million iPod customers are all idiots!&quot;

200 dollars for an Ipod.

40 dollars for a Creative Zen MP3 player.

 
 You tell me ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You must think 60 million iPod customers are all idiots!&#8221;</p>
<p>200 dollars for an Ipod.</p>
<p>40 dollars for a Creative Zen MP3 player.</p>
<p> You tell me ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129590</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129590</guid>
		<description>Jesus H Christ, when will you people Check your facts!

The ipod will play music from virtually any source except WMA files.  The most common source on iPods is music from Compact Discs.  You can play AAC, MP3, Aiff...etc

To Say: &quot;Of course, you&#039;ll only bel able to play songs pre-approved by Apple&#039;s Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) consumer control system&quot;
is absolutlely false!

The iPod was the number #1 selling MP3 player in Canada years before the iTunes music store was even available.  What were we listening to..dead air?

Ken MacPhee
Halifax
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus H Christ, when will you people Check your facts!</p>
<p>The ipod will play music from virtually any source except WMA files.  The most common source on iPods is music from Compact Discs.  You can play AAC, MP3, Aiff&#8230;etc</p>
<p>To Say: &#8220;Of course, you&#8217;ll only bel able to play songs pre-approved by Apple&#8217;s Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) consumer control system&#8221;<br />
is absolutlely false!</p>
<p>The iPod was the number #1 selling MP3 player in Canada years before the iTunes music store was even available.  What were we listening to..dead air?</p>
<p>Ken MacPhee<br />
Halifax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129584</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129584</guid>
		<description>Of course you can play any old MP3&#039;s and AAC&#039;s. And of course you can just drag them onto the iTunes window, and of course you don&#039;t have to store them inside iTunes. You must think 60 million iPod customers are all idiots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you can play any old MP3&#8217;s and AAC&#8217;s. And of course you can just drag them onto the iTunes window, and of course you don&#8217;t have to store them inside iTunes. You must think 60 million iPod customers are all idiots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10286/comment-page-1#comment-129583</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129583</guid>
		<description>Show the average consumer a non-Apple player that uses simple drag-n-drop in Windows Explorer and they realise just how restrictive iTunes is. 

As you say though it&#039;ll be a huge hit amongst people who can&#039;t afford the overpriced iPods, although in an ideal world these people would shop around and find a perfectly good non-Apple player for half the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show the average consumer a non-Apple player that uses simple drag-n-drop in Windows Explorer and they realise just how restrictive iTunes is. </p>
<p>As you say though it&#8217;ll be a huge hit amongst people who can&#8217;t afford the overpriced iPods, although in an ideal world these people would shop around and find a perfectly good non-Apple player for half the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


