Comments on: RIAA sues wheelchair mother

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:57:54 +0000

Yep, I call it the Civil recovery Fraud. Looks like the Civil Recovery for theft loss but with out any evidence to indicate the person they site did anything. A television company did the same to me. What is unique, is these big companies drive the individual into a confidential settlement and require that they cannot report any crimes which may have occurred. Specifically, the crime of fraud. The person cannot file a complaint or ask that anyone be charged with a crime. If they brake the setttlement agreement by reporting the crime, then they are sued again. American’s are being denied the right to report a crime in a secret settlement. You cannot even reporty the attorney to the Bar. The initial court Summons and Complaint are usually made up but yet sworn to under oath as the truth. This because the complaint is hypothetical. Perjury exists here as well but in the end, you cannot report it because of private confidental agreement they are forced into. These crimes as well will not be investigated by the Justice system even if you did report them.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:17:45 +0000

One thing is for sure, they are winning no customers with their law suits. If anything folks are turning away from the pay-for sites with DRMed to the gills products.

Lately in the news is that Utube and MySpace have knuckled under to the cartels and you can expect that folks will leave there for other places where they are not so restricted. Utube and MySpace have been put into the restricted area by such a move and you can be sure it will again win no customers by the move.

It appears that the cartels in their efforts to leave no stone unturned to gain every last cent are instead alienating themselves from their customer base. This will in the end ensure the demise of the cartels as they are now known.

Since they started the sue’em all, I’ve been on boycott. I’ve not bought a single song, album, movie (nor rented one), gone to a theater, nor paided for a subscription to premium channels since the day each have picked up the banner. I will continue to do so till my death if necessary but support them in this effort I will not do.

Such cases as demonstrated here only underline the reason I feel this way.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:17:12 +0000

Pure and simple.

The Utility companies in the US use similar tactics when
they don’t get THEIR way.
They threaten to destroy lives and layoff thousands if
their financial demands aren’t acceded to.

The Record companies ( throught their front group )
will continue to use the courts, in the same way thugs used
to use lead pipes and baseball bats, to force people to
‘comply’ with their demands. Guilt or innoncence is NOT the issue,
it’s having the financial means to defend yourself, prove your
innoncence, as it were, a direct contradiction of what the law
is ’supposed’ to be … Inooncent until proven guilty.

Now it’s Guilty unless wealthy.

Since the same companies that own television and radio have
a stake in this, only ’select’ information reaches the public, creating
another maxim ….

Wealth creates Truth.

The only way to hurt them back, since you can’t make them
feel guilty, since they have no feelings, is to take from them
their wealth.

Don’t buy their CD’s .. TV’s etc..
Don’t buy ANYTHING from these companies.

Keep your money in your pocket, don’t put it in theirs.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:56:09 +0000

Why is the recording industry going after people who can’t even use a computer, let alone own one? Do they find great pleasure in this? Does it make them feel good on the inside knowing that they’re bullying someone who doesn’t have any knowledge, period?