<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash plus Firefox = Tamarin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10337/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10337</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:59:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10337/comment-page-1#comment-129762</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-129762</guid>
		<description>Whereas Mozilla serves the interests of the user, Macromedia serves the interests of the advertiser. I can&#039;t help feeling that they will fight over objectives. Will the user be able to control this, to the point of turning it off? Will the user be able to &quot;view source&quot;? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whereas Mozilla serves the interests of the user, Macromedia serves the interests of the advertiser. I can&#8217;t help feeling that they will fight over objectives. Will the user be able to control this, to the point of turning it off? Will the user be able to &#8220;view source&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
