Cult News on Landmark Education
p2pnet.net News Special:- We recently ran two items focusing on Landmark Education. The first quoted the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) which said Landmark is using alleged copyright infringements as a way to stifle free speech. The second was from Landmark and attempted to discredit the first.
But there’s an excellent earlier post from Rick Ross on Cult News which gets right down to details. It’s dated October 29, but Ross tells us he’s expecting to run a follow-up in the near future.
For now, below is the first Cult News item, Why did Landmark Education leave France?:
Can it be that this for-profit privately owned company currently run by Erhard’s younger brother Harry and his sister Joan, which boasts 52 offices in 21 countries and combined global revenue of more than $70 million dollars in 2004, doesn’t think Paris is profitable?
Inside the Paris Forum
Perhaps the reasoning behind the evacuation of Paris by the controversial company formerly known as “est” (Erhard Seminars Training), was a scathing expose’ aired on France’s Channel 3 TV.
Up until recently no one outside of the French knew just how damaging this television program might be.
However, thanks to “You Tube” the complete program about Landmark can now be seen with English subtitles (click on the links provided within this article to see each segment).
What the French investigative report accomplished is indeed awesome.
The crew of channel 3 effectively penetrated the shroud of secrecy that surrounds Landmark’s introductory seminar called the Forum, by using tiny hidden cameras.
This provided proof firsthand to the French about what goes on inside the three days of training sessions.
Alain Roth
Within the first segment the audience is introduced to Alain Roth, Landmark’s former French director, who leads the seminar.
Roth subjects one woman to “public humiliation” before hundreds of participants and calls her an “asshole.” After being berated by the Landmark leader for about an hour she breaks down in tears while he insults and mocks her.
Forum leader abusive
In this segment the audience is also introduced to some of Landmark’s jargon, comprised of thought-terminating cliches such as “racket” and ”inauthentic.” Terms Roth routinely uses to dismiss anyone that asks him questions that he doesn’t really want to answer.
In the second segment a lawyer and “brainwashing expert” explains that Landmark “breaks a person” and he labels its methods ”totalitarian.”
Sophie McLean
On balance an interview is included with Landmark’s designated spokesperson, Sophie McLean, flown in from New York.
Ms. McLean attempts to dismiss the description that her company is a “cult” or “cult-like” and that its business is somehow based upon “brainwashing.”
McLean specifically cites a report Landmark paid a French psychiatrist Jean-Marie Abigrall to prepare.
However, despite being paid more than 45,000 Euro Dr. Abigrall is less than positive about Landmark. He laments that Landmark’s leaders lack meaningful training and calls this “shocking.” He then refuses to take a position as to whether the company is a cult or not.
During segment three unhappy Landmark customers refer to it as a ”sect,” which is the word most commonly used by Europeans to describe what Americans would call a “cult.”
One woman says she was treated “like a puppet.”
Channel 3 then interviews Jean-Pierre Brard the Deputy Mayor of Montreuil who once served as vice-president of the French Assembly committee designated to investigate and identify “sects.”
Brard says McLean is “lying” and explains that Landmark meets the criteria of a “sect” because it features a “guru who destabilizes people to enslave them” and “relinquish critical thought.”
The blunt Brard goes on to describe Landmark as a “network of money” focused primarily on making profits.
In segment four one former student describes the long grueling hours of training, within a tightly controlled environment, which allows participants little time for critical thinking or “perspective.”
Landmark’s method of “education” is labeled “emotional abuse.”
Then an expert sociologist discusses the “structured” and “organized” seminar format that engenders “total power” for the leader. He also concludes, “the goal is to destabilize the individual.”
The ”brainwashing expert” adds that Landmark participants are systematically regressed to a “child-like state,” that affords the guru/leader a “stranglehold.”
The fifth segment reveals that much of what outsiders might perceive as spontaneous about Landmark and its students is in fact carefully rehearsed. The so-called “graduation” event at the end of a Forum is actually a “well-oiled ritual” devised for “seduction” or recruitment.
A former seven-year member of Scientology compares her “sect” to what is shown about Landmark. She observes that the two organizations have a very similar approach.
Roth is called a “manipulator” that uses a contrived vocabulary ”incomprehensible” to those outside of Landmark.
In the final sixth segment Landmark’s “volunteers” are filmed doing everything from working the phones to scrubbing the bathroom floor for free.
Channel 3 also captures firsthand how the company’s volunteers repeatedly call, some say harass, past participants to take more courses.
Never before has what’s wrong with Landmark been so precisely captured firsthand on film.
At the end of the program it’s not hard to understand why the company gave up on making money in France.
One French Landmark supporter interviewed by Channel 3 cries as she is confronted with the footage recording the bad behavior of her mentor Alain Roth. She then attempts to deny that anything is wrong, but even this diehard apparently finds the film footage undeniably disturbing.
No doubt Landmark Education will find the sharing of this revealing television program through “You Tube” disturbing as well.
It is difficult to deny the stark evidence provided of its inner workings when its been captured by cameras.
During the 1970s Werner Erhard relied upon the secrecy that surrounded his seminar business, but now with the Internet and tiny hidden cameras it is so much harder to control information.
Erhard is now 70, a multi-millionaire and reportedly lives in the Cayman Islands with his long-time girlfriend.
Lately it seems he is concerned about a “legacy.”
A documentary titled ”Transformation: The Life and Legacy of Werner Erhard” has been making the rounds at film festivals, which is focused on Erhard’s supposed contribution to the so-called “human potential movement.”
The documentary was done with Erhard’s full cooperation.
Don’t expect to see any of the French footage in what some may see as a “puff piece” that goes soft on the old guru.
You can also see the 2003 French documentary “Inside Landmark Forum,” by downloading it here.
Postscript: Since this article was posted all the video clips have been removed. There is no longer any Internet access to the French television program about Landmark Education. All that remains at You Tube is a clip promoting the ”documentary” titled “Transformation” about the so-called “legacy” of Werner Erhard. At You Tube it says “This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.” At the Internet Archive, which formally featured the complete 2003 French documentary it states, “The item is not available due to issues with the item’s content.” Who do you suppose had “issues” with the content of this material and pressured the servers to suspend access? It seems that when some people can’t defeat the facts they resort to censorship.
Update: The video can be viewed and/or downloaded from Google Video.
Another update: Google has removed the documentary. But streaming video is now available through another site called “Daily Motion” click here. If you would rather download the documentary it’s available through Torrents click here.
Stay tuned.
Also See:
stifle free speech – Landmark ‘bogus copyright claim’, October 30, 2006
attempted to discredit – Landmark disputes EFF charges, November 3, 2006
p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php






November 9th, 2006 at 11:27 pm
Holy Smokes, these bozos must feel like they have a lot to hide. The links to the video are being shut down FAST. This is not and never was about copyright. These are some shady, evil people who know the light of day will tumble their dirty little kingdom.
November 10th, 2006 at 7:05 pm
To download the Landmark Education French video, you can go to PirateBay for BitTorrent:
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3537369/2003_Inside_Landmark_Forum.avi/
View the video in streaming format here:
http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1243&Itemid=12url
And read about how Landmark Education attempted to suppress Freedom of Speech over the internet through Bogus use of the DMCA act, here:
http://www.rickross.com/reference/landmark/landmark222.html
and here
http://www.rickross.com/reference/landmark/landmark223.html
November 11th, 2006 at 9:08 am
Much like Scientology, Landmark is trying to shut down truths that it doesn’t want people to know about.
Scientology’s efforts failed miserably and served only to draw further focus onto the cult. Now, with the Landmark story starting to hit the major news providers, the question is whether Landmark is willing to stand up to the scrutiny.
Here’s hoping that some journalists take the time to view the video and see what all the fuss is about.
Could be fun.
December 14th, 2006 at 2:16 pm
Tom Bailey here,
I liked the Forum and I received excellent results. I was a skeptic going in but was able to get great personal life results. That is what spoke to me.
http://sms100.blogspot.com/
December 19th, 2007 at 6:42 am
Hi, this is Rosalind from Australia.
I did the Landmark Forum back in February 2001. I’ve read a bit about cults and I just don’t see how Landmark fits that mould. I can’t say I enjoyed the experience but at the end of it and up to now, I have a life and relationships I wouldn’t have dreamed I could possibly have back then and I know it’s due to the the experience of doing the forum and using the technology from it.
I did many courses with them and sure, they advertise by word of mouth so the best people to do that are people who have gained by the experience.
I’d say, if you really want to prove all the stuff that is supposed to be so bad about it – spend the money, do it yourself and then make a judgement. Up to then, it’s all just opinions and conjecture.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Show me some hard facts. This film is full of holes. The journalist’s here were fined for violating their own journalist’s code of ethics in order to give a biased and inauthentic report. What ever happened to innocent untill proven guilty?
March 17th, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Hi Rosalind,
I have a few friends who have been to landmark. The first category, which benefited from the various courses they took/ are taking (at considerable cost in both time and money) are incredibly vulnerable sorts with a need to belong. Unlike you, they have achieved very little, except maybe ridicule for holding views which have progressively estranged them from their good friends and now finding themselves increasingly isolated. These good friends have been replaced by individuals who hold selfish and destructive points of view who confuse self improvement with selfishness and a total lack of personal integrity.
The second category, those who called the seminar dangerous, abusive etc at worst to a total waste of time and money at best, are what I consider individuals who are not vulnerable, with a good friends and family networks and a developed self of sense and a high EQ.
Having had discussions about LGATS that used abusive techniques with peers of mine in the field of medicine and psychology, they pretty much confirmed the dangers of such groups on the weak and vulnerable. They also said that the majority of participants are white, between the ages of 25 and 40 from a middle class background and female, that is with disposable income.
This was highlighted by the French documentary and other articles and books and it saddens me that with all the available information that people are still vulnerable to such groups.