<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada targets online kiddie porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10537/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10537</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:08:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10537/comment-page-1#comment-130871</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-130871</guid>
		<description>&#039;Project Cleanfeed Canada&#039;, has a nice Orwellian ring to it don&#039;t you think?

This is how it always starts.  After all, anyone against this censorship plan will be labeled a child-porn lover by the drooling masses.  

It should also be noted that nobody involved in the plan actually expects this plan to work, since there are millions of child-porn sites and they are changing all the time. And on top of that, the majority of child-porn is passed around via mailing lists, usenet, and other various means.

Now that the big ISPs have shown their willingness to block sites, don&#039;t be surprised when it goes past child-porn.  Next it will be trial
publication bans, then &#039;hate speech&#039;, then de-tax sites (those are already being targeted behind closed doors), video/music download sites, then anything that someone in a high place doesn&#039;t want to be seen...

Canada is quickly becoming a nation of little pussy cowards just like the states... we toss away liberties and freedoms because we a afraid of this or afraid of that.  They expect people to be brave enough to dodge bullets overseas to &#039;preserve freedom&#039;, yet all the little pansies at home couldn&#039;t turn their rights over quick enough to be protected from whatever boogy-man happens to be lurking in the shadows this week.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Project Cleanfeed Canada&#8217;, has a nice Orwellian ring to it don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>This is how it always starts.  After all, anyone against this censorship plan will be labeled a child-porn lover by the drooling masses.  </p>
<p>It should also be noted that nobody involved in the plan actually expects this plan to work, since there are millions of child-porn sites and they are changing all the time. And on top of that, the majority of child-porn is passed around via mailing lists, usenet, and other various means.</p>
<p>Now that the big ISPs have shown their willingness to block sites, don&#8217;t be surprised when it goes past child-porn.  Next it will be trial<br />
publication bans, then &#8216;hate speech&#8217;, then de-tax sites (those are already being targeted behind closed doors), video/music download sites, then anything that someone in a high place doesn&#8217;t want to be seen&#8230;</p>
<p>Canada is quickly becoming a nation of little pussy cowards just like the states&#8230; we toss away liberties and freedoms because we a afraid of this or afraid of that.  They expect people to be brave enough to dodge bullets overseas to &#8216;preserve freedom&#8217;, yet all the little pansies at home couldn&#8217;t turn their rights over quick enough to be protected from whatever boogy-man happens to be lurking in the shadows this week&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10537/comment-page-1#comment-130863</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-130863</guid>
		<description>I assume then that we can all now sue our ISPs when our computer is damaged by an online attack, since they have taken on the legal responsibility for determining what content gets through to customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume then that we can all now sue our ISPs when our computer is damaged by an online attack, since they have taken on the legal responsibility for determining what content gets through to customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
