<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 4 labels on UK copyright term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10585/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10585</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10585/comment-page-1#comment-131001</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-131001</guid>
		<description>&quot;both the musicians who make a living out of music and the companies who invest in them&quot;

Is this a joke? Yes, an expansion of the copyright duration myth, that artists (creators) are so forward looking that they invest their time thinking on the profits of many years later when actual corporate capital investment is never made thinking long range, just thinking on the duration of the employment of the decision makers at most.

As a person with some experience in making capital equipment investments decisions at large American manufacturing companies, I can tell that it is very hard to get approval for an investment that will not pay itself in five years. Certainly no one invests anything if the payback is over 10 years.

It is absurd to think that a musician can &quot;make a living&quot; out of recordings made 100 years ago.

As to investment on musicians, no record company invests on musicians, (the so called &quot;artist development&quot; bullshit - whatever that means). I have met many musicians and many have been financially helped to study by parents, governments, friends and othersbut never by a record company.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;both the musicians who make a living out of music and the companies who invest in them&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a joke? Yes, an expansion of the copyright duration myth, that artists (creators) are so forward looking that they invest their time thinking on the profits of many years later when actual corporate capital investment is never made thinking long range, just thinking on the duration of the employment of the decision makers at most.</p>
<p>As a person with some experience in making capital equipment investments decisions at large American manufacturing companies, I can tell that it is very hard to get approval for an investment that will not pay itself in five years. Certainly no one invests anything if the payback is over 10 years.</p>
<p>It is absurd to think that a musician can &#8220;make a living&#8221; out of recordings made 100 years ago.</p>
<p>As to investment on musicians, no record company invests on musicians, (the so called &#8220;artist development&#8221; bullshit &#8211; whatever that means). I have met many musicians and many have been financially helped to study by parents, governments, friends and othersbut never by a record company.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
<a href="http://www.gvenegas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gvenegas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


