<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP&#8217;s Pattie Dunn goes online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:32:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: P2PNet &#124; Pattie Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614/comment-page-1#comment-173347</link>
		<dc:creator>P2PNet &#124; Pattie Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-173347</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;HP&#8217;s Pattie Dunn goes Online&#8221; Click Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;HP&#8217;s Pattie Dunn goes Online&#8221; Click Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614/comment-page-1#comment-131093</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 02:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-131093</guid>
		<description>Yes, her sister - and that would be me. BTW, it is not a blog - it is a website. And I am not an &quot;anonymous coward&quot;. My name and picture are on my website. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, her sister &#8211; and that would be me. BTW, it is not a blog &#8211; it is a website. And I am not an &#8220;anonymous coward&#8221;. My name and picture are on my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614/comment-page-1#comment-131038</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-131038</guid>
		<description>She won&#039;t have much sympathy from me. She represents the blood suckers of the infection call corporations. She thought it is perfectly alright to ignore privacy laws. They weren&#039;t convenient and were in the way of what she thought to accomplish. When some of the junior underlings said it was possibility against the law, what happened? They weren&#039;t heard as it wasn&#039;t what the boss wanted to hear. Got in the way of getting the job done. 

Now it seems in the checking out just how bad this little inconvenience got in the way and what they were willing to do to get around it, it turns out there are other little inconveniences, such as insider block trades of stock by nearly all the boardroom. In otherwords not only did they attempt to change the value of the stock prices but also to cash in on those changes at the expense of the stockholders they were supposed to represent.  

It&#039;s most opportunistic that Patties&#039; sister jumps in to try and save the day. Where was Patties&#039; sister when it was time to consider the ramifications of the actions Patty chose to take? And just where does Patties&#039; sister sit in the line of these stock sales? It is a very common dodge to give family members stock to duck the hit on taxes. Is there a bit of self interest in this on line business? 

Call me skeptical but I&#039;ve seen enough demonstrations of what corporate considers ok for them to do but not for the average citizen. One has only to look at this part where the **AA&#039;s went against pretexting and what their reasons were to understand that aspect. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She won&#8217;t have much sympathy from me. She represents the blood suckers of the infection call corporations. She thought it is perfectly alright to ignore privacy laws. They weren&#8217;t convenient and were in the way of what she thought to accomplish. When some of the junior underlings said it was possibility against the law, what happened? They weren&#8217;t heard as it wasn&#8217;t what the boss wanted to hear. Got in the way of getting the job done. </p>
<p>Now it seems in the checking out just how bad this little inconvenience got in the way and what they were willing to do to get around it, it turns out there are other little inconveniences, such as insider block trades of stock by nearly all the boardroom. In otherwords not only did they attempt to change the value of the stock prices but also to cash in on those changes at the expense of the stockholders they were supposed to represent.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s most opportunistic that Patties&#8217; sister jumps in to try and save the day. Where was Patties&#8217; sister when it was time to consider the ramifications of the actions Patty chose to take? And just where does Patties&#8217; sister sit in the line of these stock sales? It is a very common dodge to give family members stock to duck the hit on taxes. Is there a bit of self interest in this on line business? </p>
<p>Call me skeptical but I&#8217;ve seen enough demonstrations of what corporate considers ok for them to do but not for the average citizen. One has only to look at this part where the **AA&#8217;s went against pretexting and what their reasons were to understand that aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10614/comment-page-1#comment-131034</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-131034</guid>
		<description>her sister?
suuure!

What was that all about again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>her sister?<br />
suuure!</p>
<p>What was that all about again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
