Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

McTeague backs CRIA/CAAST

p2pnet.net news:- The Hill Times this week has two Copyright related articles. One is from Gordon Duggan, co-founder of the Appropriation Art Coalition, who talks about the appearance the Minister of Canadian Heritage is not listening to all sides of the debate (p29).

The Liberal vice-chair of the Standing Committee of Industry, Science and Technology, Dan McTeague (Pickering – Scarborough East), signs an article that reads as if it was authored by CRIA or CAAST (p31).

I have to wonder if he was intended to deflect fund-raising related critiques of the Conservative Minister of Heritage by saying the Liberal vice-chair on Industry will demonstrate as much of a one-sided view for free?

Mr McTeague’s article contains the same controversial statistics we’re constantly needing to refute from the BSA/CAAST.

The BSA counts the number of computers shipped, over-estimates the demand for people running their member software, subtracts the number of boxes they actually shipped, and declares the difference as “software theft”.

In reality, that difference also includes everyone who’s legally using Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) which doesn’t have a per-unit cost (marginal cost) and thus aren’t counted the same way as BSA member software. What the BSA is really fighting against isn’t “software theft”, but their major FLOSS competitors who represent the fastest growing part of the software industry.

Mr McTeagues confuses controversial copyright issues with the largely separate issue of counterfeiting.

Nobody has a problem with the government enacting laws to deal with commercial counterfeiting where someone is making money by illegally, pretending someone elses work is their own. What we are critical of is enacting legislation based on things such as the 1996 WIPO treaties which are aimed not at reducing harmful commercial copyright infringement, but at reducing competition for the incumbent industry association members.

If Canada is to become more competitive, we need to support innovation and competition, not tie ourselves to an ever increasing trade deficit with the United States by outlawing Canadian competition to incumbent US companies.

Russell McOrmondp2pnet contributing editor
[McOrmond is an independent author (software and non-software) who uses modern business models and licensing (Free/Libre and Open Source Software, Creative Commons). He's also the CLUE policy coordinator.]


p2pnet newsfeeds for your site.

rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss
Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
TekSavvy


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®