Comments on: Kazaa sued in class action

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:30:44 +0000

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:46:20 +0000

Just the fact that the troll wants to scare people away was enough to make me check it out. It’s a text file and a very interesting read. No wonder the troll has resorted to profanity.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:36:36 +0000

When one has no other logical or reasonable stance ….

That’s all you have left Eh Gach ?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:07:10 +0000

like we’re going to click YOUR link. HAHAH

“It surreptitiously installed ’spyware’ on users’ computers which made the shared files folder accessible to the Kazaa network even after the user had removed the Kazaa software from his or her computer** this whole sentence is bs except for installing spyware which it does. but the spyware doesnt make the folders available on the kazaa network at all it just pops up ads.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:16:26 +0000

” Apparently anyone who expresses freedom of speech that contradicts you John is a troll ”

So why can’t Jon speak freely about the stuff you are
referring to troll ?
It’s because a large well monied entity has used it’s financial
weight to Censor Jon. He can’t speak out on his own behalf,
due to financial censorship. Someone who Jon doesn’t know
or ever met expressed freedom of speech that contradicted
Nikki Hemming, so therefore Jon can be censored, not by
weight of law, but by large buckets of cash ?

Free Speech is only for your wealthy owners, troll ?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:06:23 +0000

Glad you still ’sign’ your posts.

“BTW, I thought your defence was there was alibel but it was beyond your control or has your freedom of speech extended to freedom to speak of alternative versions of the truth? ”

No alternate version at all.
the COMPLETE facts of the case are here …

http://s22.quicksharing.com/v/3421267/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

I guarantee that anyone reading this will have no doubt about
the absolute ridiculousness of Hemmings claim.

No libel.
none,

but you know that already.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:14:11 +0000

Apparently anyone who expresses freedom of speech that contradicts you John is a troll…again how do we get onto the list of people you allow to express freedom of opinion, or even better let us all know how you stay off the list of people who can be victimised by your brand of freedom of speech so we don’t end up like Hemming.

BTW, I thought your defence was there was alibel but it was beyond your control or has your freedom of speech extended to freedom to speak of alternative versions of the truth?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:00:06 +0000

” Most suspicious that our troll about the “wrongs” Jon does chooses this topic to reply in. I would say right off the bat it is someone with an axe to grind and hopes to provoke some sort of response proving that Jon does indeed keep logs. ”

Precisely.
He is trying to get ANY kind of response he can use to
pass along to his ‘boss’ .. ain’t that right Gachnar ?

BTW, there was no libel by Jon.

For all of the FACTS ..

http://s22.quicksharing.com/v/3421267/P2Pnetsuit.zip.html

Just the facts, no spin.
All of this info is public, so no libel here either

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:50:02 +0000

what a dum ass with a comment like that….

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:48:44 +0000

Most suspicious that our troll about the “wrongs” Jon does chooses this topic to reply in. I would say right off the bat it is someone with an axe to grind and hopes to provoke some sort of response proving that Jon does indeed keep logs. Why else would one want to provoke and goad?

Keep up the good work Jon. You can see by such responses you are hitting “sensitive nerves”. In this application, always a good sign.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:06:52 +0000

This is neat John, another chance to libel someone who didn’t take advertising with you. Everyone has noticed that you don’t want the truth about your own libel case and the various comments denouncing your behaviour to have the same kind of freedom that you give to any libel against your last victim as a publisher

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:13:25 +0000

THE criminals are in fact the greedy people who faked Kazaa with Spyware. Kazaa was buyed and faked for the only purpose to rip off peple. Now the bastards have to pay back!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:31:42 +0000

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36249

Nikki Hemming, of Sharman Networks, was in the dock in the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney over a row about a list of her assets ahead of a possible court order for damages against Kazaa’s owners.