Comments on: RIAA tries to bury Dutch finding

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:08:45 +0000

“American judges too retarded usually to read foreign cases”

Actually, sometimes they are too retarded to read their own cases.The proof is here:

FUSTÉ OVERLOOKS THE $1,000,000 SONY-SONOLUX-LAMCO PARTNERSHIP INFRINGEMENT
http://rafa_venegas.web.prdigital.com/fuste_overlooks_sony_sonolux_records.htm

FUSTÉ OVERLOOKS THE $43,405 LUCECITA PERFORMANCE OF GÉNESIS
http://rafa_venegas.web.prdigital.com/fuste_overlooks_lucecita_performance.htm

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:21:34 +0000

Mediasentry was lambasted when the music monopolies tried suing people in Canada. The judge threw it out because Mediasentry evidence was grossly inconclusive and sloppy. As it should have been. Mediasentry is a fucking joke of an operation, no wonder they have been pointing fingers at people not even involved in P2P activity in the states. Perhaps a lawsuit against Mediasentry by people who have been fingered by them would be in order……

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:41:32 +0000

the “L” is only for “RIAA Richard”

–
Alter_Fritz