<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple says Cisco iPod suit is &#8217;silly&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10990/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10990</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10990/comment-page-1#comment-132145</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-132145</guid>
		<description>Just what I was going to say.  There&#039;s nothing like the sweet, sweet taste of karma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I was going to say.  There&#8217;s nothing like the sweet, sweet taste of karma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10990/comment-page-1#comment-132131</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-132131</guid>
		<description>And after two years of such things, Apple has the nerve to say Cisco&#039;s claim is &quot;silly&quot;.

They only copied the whole name for this products, where other people used the word &quot;Pod&quot; or &quot;i&quot; as a part of their names.. 

So suing someone for infringing on a trademark is &quot;silly&quot;, yet suing people over a word in the dictionary is not?

Wow Apple, you just made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And after two years of such things, Apple has the nerve to say Cisco&#8217;s claim is &#8220;silly&#8221;.</p>
<p>They only copied the whole name for this products, where other people used the word &#8220;Pod&#8221; or &#8220;i&#8221; as a part of their names.. </p>
<p>So suing someone for infringing on a trademark is &#8220;silly&#8221;, yet suing people over a word in the dictionary is not?</p>
<p>Wow Apple, you just made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


