Comments on: Apple’s iPhone hijack: more http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10998 p2pnet.net - reader powered Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10998/comment-page-1#comment-132202 Reader's Write Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:08:18 +0000 #comment-132202 Indeed, Apple Inc. has found themselves at the hand of numerous lawsuits by a relatively unknown company (to consumers anyway) called Apple Corps., who owns Apple Records. Originally, the settlement made upon Apple's foundation was that Apple would not enter the music business. Since iTunes, the iPod, and the iTunes Store, however, Apple Inc. has been fighting Apple Corps in the courts, usually with success. Will this new lawsuit of trademark infringement put Apple Inc. in their place? Probably not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps Indeed, Apple Inc. has found themselves at the hand of numerous lawsuits by a relatively unknown company (to consumers anyway) called Apple Corps., who owns Apple Records. Originally, the settlement made upon Apple’s foundation was that Apple would not enter the music business. Since iTunes, the iPod, and the iTunes Store, however, Apple Inc. has been fighting Apple Corps in the courts, usually with success.

Will this new lawsuit of trademark infringement put Apple Inc. in their place? Probably not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/10998/comment-page-1#comment-132158 Reader's Write Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:45:34 +0000 #comment-132158 All I have to say to Cisco, Well done! At long last Apple is going to getting a serious legal attack. Also reading between the line in the Cisco statement, I think Cisco see Apple behaver in the past as being questionable. What I say "What comes around, goes around!" and I have no problems with Apple being attacked this way. If I was Apple I would not boast in public about patents. You are just asking for someone to take you on. It would be interesting to know what patents they are talking about, just so that we could see if there is any prior art. Also lets see if any part of this device from Apple infringes on any patent troll rights. lol Apple laid down the challenge and we shall rise against them. Apple loves to be the b**** ie Apple news site's let give them some of there own medicent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll All I have to say to Cisco, Well done!

At long last Apple is going to getting a serious legal attack. Also reading between the line in the Cisco statement, I think Cisco see Apple behaver in the past as being questionable. What I say “What comes around, goes around!” and I have no problems with Apple being attacked this way.

If I was Apple I would not boast in public about patents. You are just asking for someone to take you on. It would be interesting to know what patents they are talking about, just so that we could see if there is any prior art. Also lets see if any part of this device from Apple infringes on any patent troll rights.
lol

Apple laid down the challenge and we shall rise against them. Apple loves to be the b**** ie Apple news site’s let give them some of there own medicent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll

]]>