Comments on: IsoHunt, The Return http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11103 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11103/comment-page-1#comment-132484 Reader's Write Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:26:35 +0000 #comment-132484 ___Second attempt at validation___ It happens elsewhere, too, but it may be something I can improve once I have other things settled. Cheers! ___Second attempt at validation___

It happens elsewhere, too, but it may be something I can improve once I have other things settled.

Cheers!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11103/comment-page-1#comment-132480 Reader's Write Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:51:54 +0000 #comment-132480 Whack-a-mole plainly isn't working except for the case where funding is critical because it's done by one man operations on a shoestring. If the site has funding due to its size, they have the means to setup other sites in other nations less restrictive than the PSA (Police States of America). You can be sure it is driving them up a wall to think "we got them where we want them" only to have the site in question move out to more forgiving countries. That's what the internet shines at. Look at the attempts at spam control to see it in action. My question now becomes how long till we see the same sort of support for indexing machines where the source isn't readily findable? I would suspect that if these sort of moves become commonplace and if the cartels are successful in eliminating places to run, the next step will be to follow the path shown by the netbots. Will the cartels then try to sue those that have no idea that their machines are being used to store a small amount of the total database? Good luck on proving willful infringement on that scenario. It would give the whack-a-mole a new definition. *Second attempt at validation Whack-a-mole plainly isn’t working except for the case where funding is critical because it’s done by one man operations on a shoestring. If the site has funding due to its size, they have the means to setup other sites in other nations less restrictive than the PSA (Police States of America).

You can be sure it is driving them up a wall to think “we got them where we want them” only to have the site in question move out to more forgiving countries. That’s what the internet shines at.

Look at the attempts at spam control to see it in action. My question now becomes how long till we see the same sort of support for indexing machines where the source isn’t readily findable? I would suspect that if these sort of moves become commonplace and if the cartels are successful in eliminating places to run, the next step will be to follow the path shown by the netbots. Will the cartels then try to sue those that have no idea that their machines are being used to store a small amount of the total database? Good luck on proving willful infringement on that scenario. It would give the whack-a-mole a new definition.

*Second attempt at validation

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11103/comment-page-1#comment-132467 Reader's Write Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:06:51 +0000 #comment-132467 First The Pirate Bay and now ISOhunt....just another black eye for the **AA's! First The Pirate Bay and now ISOhunt….just another black eye for the **AA’s!

]]>