Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

‘Doctored’ Wikipedia storm

p2pnet.net News:- Doug Mahugh, a technical expert for Office Open XML, says he was the Microsoft employee who contacted Australian programmer and standards activist Rick Jelliffe, offering to pay him to massage Wikipedia entries Microsoft didn’t approve of.

Hiring someone to change Wikipedia entries is definitely not on, but Bill and the Boyz have admitted Microsoft wanted Jellife to, “correct what the company was sure were inaccuracies in Wikipedia articles on an open-source document standard and a rival format put forward by Microsoft,” namely, IBM.

Now, in a slashdot comment post, Mahugh, “published what he said was an excerpt from an email to Jelliffe, detailing ‘what I asked Rick to do’,” says The Age, going on:

“Wikipedia has an entry on Open XML that has a lot of slanted language, and we’d like for them to make it more objective but we feel that it would be best if a non-Microsoft person were the source of any corrections,” reads the email Mahugh apparently wrote to Jelliffe.

“Would you have any interest or availability to do some of this kind of work? Your reputation as a leading voice in the XML community would carry a lot of credibility, so your name came up in a discussion of the Wikipedia situation today.”

The email, “also encouraged Jelliffe to disclose his deal with Microsoft in his blog at oreillynet.com, and reassured Jelliffe that Microsoft did not have to approve any of his Wikipedia edits before they were made,” says the story, adding:

“This morning Jelliffe was not at his Pyrmont office and could not be reached on his mobile for comment.

“Microsoft spokeswoman Catherine Brooker said she believed the articles were heavily written by people at IBM, which is a big supporter of the rival open-source standard. IBM did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”

Slashdot Slashdot it!

Also See:
massage Wikipedia entriesMicrosoft Wikipedia row, January 24, 2007
The AgeMicrosoft ‘tried to doctor Wikipedia’, January 24, 2007


Want to subscribe to p2pnet by email with Feedburner? Just click here.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php | | And use our own p2pnet newsfeeds for your site


If your Net access is blocked by government restrictions, try Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk Centre for International Studies. Go here for the official download, here for the p2pnet download, and here for details. And if you’re Chinese and you’re looking for a way to access independent Internet news sources, try Freegate, the DIT program written to help Chinese citizens circumvent web site blocking outside of China. Download it here.

HOME

One Response to “‘Doctored’ Wikipedia storm”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    During their anti-trust trial in the US, Microsoft was also being investigated in Europe for similar practices. They were writing letters to the authorities, using the names of people, who some of didn’t exist or were dead and buried, to bloster their position as a company that everyone loves.

    ha ha ha ha

    AND THEY GOT CAUGHT DOING IT

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy