Comments on: Interview with The Pirate Bay http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11144 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: nunca nueve » Simpsons Movie http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11144/comment-page-1#comment-151561 nunca nueve » Simpsons Movie Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:32:35 +0000 #comment-151561 [...] recomano llegir l’entrevista als 3 que porten The Pirate Bay. Va bé llegir-ho per saber què pensen, i com a mínim jo, em crec [...] [...] recomano llegir l’entrevista als 3 que porten The Pirate Bay. Va bé llegir-ho per saber què pensen, i com a mínim jo, em crec [...]

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11144/comment-page-1#comment-132791 Reader's Write Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:11:54 +0000 #comment-132791 technicly there is no childporn on their site either. only textfiles that tell you where you can find something that might be "childpornography"*. As they argued, if that what is spread via Bittorrent would be real childpornography then those that spread it via Bittorrent must be very stupid and its good if TPB would keep those txt files so the police can catch those perverts easier then if they would use some form of darknet. * a video of an 18 year old girl having consenting sex with a 16 year old boy is labeled childpornography in some jurisdictions for example. So IMO their aproach to censor nothing and only delete if filename/description is not what the content is about is the best example of freedom __ Alter_Fritz technicly there is no childporn on their site either.

only textfiles that tell you where you can find something that might be “childpornography”*.

As they argued, if that what is spread via Bittorrent would be real childpornography then those that spread it via Bittorrent must be very stupid and its good if TPB would keep those txt files so the police can catch those perverts easier then if they would use some form of darknet.

* a video of an 18 year old girl having consenting sex with a 16 year old boy is labeled childpornography in some jurisdictions for example.

So IMO their aproach to censor nothing and only delete if filename/description is not what the content is about is the best example of freedom

__
Alter_Fritz

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11144/comment-page-1#comment-132778 Reader's Write Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:42:32 +0000 #comment-132778 Honestly... i respect their position on the state of things (except the child porn). You either sensor EVERYTHING or you sensor NOTHING. To me child porn is outside of this realm of responsibility though. That is something that would NOT be on MY site whatsoever under any circumstances. But I respect the fact that they seem to be all about the liberation of information. You HAVE to have money to support that one basic purpose, but they dont seem to be taking any more than that from it. Cheers TPB. Honestly… i respect their position on the state of things (except the child porn). You either sensor EVERYTHING or you sensor NOTHING.
To me child porn is outside of this realm of responsibility though. That is something that would NOT be on MY site whatsoever under any circumstances. But I respect the fact that they seem to be all about the liberation of information. You HAVE to have money to support that one basic purpose, but they dont seem to be taking any more than that from it. Cheers TPB.

]]>