Comments on: Canada music download record

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:34:37 +0000

You have a point there. P2P protocols, and in particular BitTorrent which is currently the most popular of them, usually require a person to upload if they want to download, often in equal parts. If people were no longer forced to download illicit material, then nobody would be uploading it either. It really is that simple. Sure, shared folders containing copyrighted material would still be out there, but if none of it is exchanging hands and moving about from user to user, then little to no infringement would be taking place. Of course, the entertainment industry would like laws created that change this, making shared folders illegal even if nobody copies anything from them or they’re only available for a few moments (say by accident), but that doesn’t make all of what I just said any less true.

It really is too bad that the industry prefers to bury it’s head in the sand when it comes to putting audio and video content online for download. I’ve said for years now that if it were reasonably priced, of decent quality, and lacked measures that prevented me from using it where and when I want to, I’d be broke all the time. This is especially true in regards to high-def material.

I just purchased a nice big 1080p television recently for my home theater. My content provider options are very limited where I live, and am quite desperate to have all my TV in HD now that I’ve finally experienced it. Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are a start, but the format war hinders them a lot. Sadly, the industry would rather stomp out any and all forms of online distribution, refusing to see just how much money they could be making, which I have no doubt is a lot. Probably on the order billions per year.

Despite being able to get music, movies, and TV shows for free through P2P, I’m sure many folks would rather have a perfectly legal solution that didn’t put them at risk of litigation, and that definitely includes myself. I just don’t understand what their issue exactly is over this though, and why they prefer to ruin lives instead of making the world a better place for all. Maybe they refuse to believe that people actually would pay for services in the manner I’ve suggested? Perhaps it’s fear mixed with greed? Who knows, but whatever it is they need to realize that they aren’t just hurting us, the paying public, but themselves as well. I do know that the longer they go on destroying lives like they’ve been doing, the harder it will be to make a come back. After all, the public can only take so much before the damage to relations becomes irreparable.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:11:05 +0000

The falicacy of the RIAA’s and its Canadian conterpart’s contention that a song downloaded represents a lost sale is very apparent. Just because a song is downloaded by an individual does not necessarily mean that individual, in the absense of the ability to download, would actually spend money to buy the same song.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 04:53:24 +0000

The only reason that the majors are losing money is because their legal tactics and their DRM are coaxing users onto the P2P networks. Look at eMusic. It’s the second most popular digital store in the world. I also read somewhere that Audible Magic or some sort of watermarking is placed on eMusic MP3s so that they can be identified on P2P networks, and that, upon searching for some of the songs eMusic offers, relatively few watermarked results came up. I can’t verify that, but if it is true, it shows that consumers will keep to themselves when their needs are met instead of assisting in the illicit file trade, if only to help others in their situation.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 04:05:16 +0000

It may be as you say but these actions have certainly altered my purchasing habits. I don’t want a cd that isn’t a cd and doesn’t support standard cd requirements. In otherwords, if I buy a cd or what appears to be a cd, I want it to play in my vehicle player. If I go in and want to use that same cd on my computer or in a portable player, I expect it to work. I don’t expect it to refuse to play because of some sort of protect scheme says it isn’t.

So these movies, music, and whatever aren’t what I seek. It can’t be fitted into my lifestyle and therefore makes the product far less than desirable when I can go get the same thing off the net at no cost and not have to put up with that. Simply, the majors aren’t meeting my demands and needs.

Then there’s the thing with being labeled a pirate and a thief. If they think that had no bearing on their sales, they are sadly wrong. I won’t even get into the way I feel about not supporting businesses whose business practices I don’t agree with. Let us say instead that it has cost them and I can personally attest to it.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:26:32 +0000

Sounds like wishful thinking to me, and what could be easier? While I would like to believe that the music industry will indeed be forced to change their attitude towards music fans, and that they will have to eventually stop using DRM, the purpose of which being to clearly create a monopoly for themselves much more so than controlling the who/what/where/when/how a consumer uses their product, I just find it too hard to accept. The average joe makes up the vast majority of users out there, and most folks are simply too lazy to care at all unless directly affected at some point, just like I was recently regarding CGMS-A and my PVR. Hopefully there are still enough people out there working to make a difference that there will indeed be one… eventually. Just don’t expect things to change for the better any time soon, if they ever do at all.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:05:41 +0000

The music industry in America and Canada is going to be FORCED to start trusting their customers and taking off the DRM permenantly …or face extinction….it is that simple. I do not feel sorry for these bozo’s that want to stiffle innovation one bit! Neither does the average joe…. apparently.