<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodgy Vista security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11233/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11233</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11233/comment-page-1#comment-133369</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-133369</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem with computer security both in the home and the workplace is users! Especially users who would rather rely on someone else to clean the poop off the fan after the fact than spend any time or effort learning about security themselves.

Get your users to care about security and the rest will take care of itself. Oh and if you do figure out how to get them to care, please tell me how you do it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with computer security both in the home and the workplace is users! Especially users who would rather rely on someone else to clean the poop off the fan after the fact than spend any time or effort learning about security themselves.</p>
<p>Get your users to care about security and the rest will take care of itself. Oh and if you do figure out how to get them to care, please tell me how you do it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11233/comment-page-1#comment-133359</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-133359</guid>
		<description>I agree that a competing marketer isn&#039;t going to give a good evaluation to the competitor for fear of losing sales. 

Still I have had these concerns of M$ getting into the anti-malware department based on their performance shown in XP patches and updates. M$ did not release the APIs for third party vendors to get their products to work with VISTA till after the OS was already scheduled for commercial site release. They are normally released months in advance. This effectively left a delay where third party could not be seen to compete with M$&#039;s offering until they reprogrammed for the changes required by VISTA. 

It came down to EU complaining about M$s policies before the APIs were released. Basically M$ did it at the point of a gun and would have most likely drug its feet as long as possible to prevent the inevitable competition that third party does. 

M$ does not do that good a job of covering known security holes as it is. Other than corporate bloat, I have no idea what causes the delays we often see of zero day exploits that don&#039;t see fixes for sometimes months if they come at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that a competing marketer isn&#8217;t going to give a good evaluation to the competitor for fear of losing sales. </p>
<p>Still I have had these concerns of M$ getting into the anti-malware department based on their performance shown in XP patches and updates. M$ did not release the APIs for third party vendors to get their products to work with VISTA till after the OS was already scheduled for commercial site release. They are normally released months in advance. This effectively left a delay where third party could not be seen to compete with M$&#8217;s offering until they reprogrammed for the changes required by VISTA. </p>
<p>It came down to EU complaining about M$s policies before the APIs were released. Basically M$ did it at the point of a gun and would have most likely drug its feet as long as possible to prevent the inevitable competition that third party does. </p>
<p>M$ does not do that good a job of covering known security holes as it is. Other than corporate bloat, I have no idea what causes the delays we often see of zero day exploits that don&#8217;t see fixes for sometimes months if they come at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11233/comment-page-1#comment-133350</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-133350</guid>
		<description>Of course Webroot is going to discredit Windows Defender.  They are competitors, after all.  Smearing your opponents is something common in both politics and marketing, regardless of whether or not it&#039;s true.

Webroot themselves conducted these studies.  Does that remind you of someone ELSE who doesn&#039;t use independent, unbiased research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Webroot is going to discredit Windows Defender.  They are competitors, after all.  Smearing your opponents is something common in both politics and marketing, regardless of whether or not it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Webroot themselves conducted these studies.  Does that remind you of someone ELSE who doesn&#8217;t use independent, unbiased research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


