Comments on: Wal-Mart disses Firefox, Safari

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:46:45 +0000

…as of 10 March, so a month gone with no change.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:10:01 +0000

Firefox not supporting certain websites is old news:

http://www.FirefoxMyths.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:09:57 +0000

Firefox not supporting certain websites is old news:

http://www.FirefoxMyths.com

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:33:00 +0000

Perfect! Micro$oft and Ford, and now Wal-Mart. Birds of the feather. Three losers teamed up together.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:34:53 +0000

most of the people using firefox are informed people. Please don’t think i’m saying anything more here than i am. I am just saying that if a person knows how, and to, use firefox over IE, more than likely, they aren’t stupid enough to pay 20$ for a movie that will be gone when they format their hard disk.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:58:30 +0000

We need to remember that the files that Walmart “sells” (And I use that term very loosely) will likely be DRM-infected. This will mean that they will only be usable on a Microsoft platform, blocking out Apple or any standards-based platforms like Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc. The future “fix” to this website will likely to the documentation to inform people that it isn’t just the Microsoft Browser that they need, but an entirely Microsoft-DRM controlled multimedia platform.