<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: File sharing: zero effect on downloads</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jgarofalo</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-188610</link>
		<author>Jgarofalo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-188610</guid>
		<description>Hi guys, I tried to download the .pdf of the 2007 work but it was not there, so I find the autors website, you can download it from there, here is the link:

http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/

and the .pdf you referred as (2007) is from 12-12-2006
here is that link, too:
http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/JPE%2031618%20FileSharing%202006-12-12.pdf

I hope everybody can read it, regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, I tried to download the .pdf of the 2007 work but it was not there, so I find the autors website, you can download it from there, here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/" rel="nofollow">http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/</a></p>
<p>and the .pdf you referred as (2007) is from 12-12-2006<br />
here is that link, too:<br />
<a href="http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/JPE%2031618%20FileSharing%202006-12-12.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/JPE%2031618%20FileSharing%202006-12-12.pdf</a></p>
<p>I hope everybody can read it, regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Leinss&#8217; Tech Tips - There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don&#8217;t. &#187; RIAA Extortion letter to ISPs</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-173712</link>
		<author>Adam Leinss&#8217; Tech Tips - There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don&#8217;t. &#187; RIAA Extortion letter to ISPs</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-173712</guid>
		<description>[...] Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG say files shared equal sales lost, but this claim has again been proven to be disingenuous in an authoritative paper from two American researchers in The Effect of File Sharing on Record [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG say files shared equal sales lost, but this claim has again been proven to be disingenuous in an authoritative paper from two American researchers in The Effect of File Sharing on Record [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-139199</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-139199</guid>
		<description>"Some OTHER reasons to make it go away, methinks"

   No, douchebag, you DON'T "thinks", or you wouldn't automatically leap to that conclusion.  Validation boxes are fucking worthless by definition, primarily because they damage the ability for those who can't SEE the fuckin' things, to post on forums and blogs.  Visually-impaired persons (and the blind), have been saying that for years.
      IF you're going to include a "validation box", you need to also put in some sort of audio version, so that those who can't see the fuckin' thing can still post here.

     Somebody oughta kick you in the face twenty or thirty times, you fuckin' douchebag.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some OTHER reasons to make it go away, methinks&#8221;</p>
<p>   No, douchebag, you DON&#8217;T &#8220;thinks&#8221;, or you wouldn&#8217;t automatically leap to that conclusion.  Validation boxes are fucking worthless by definition, primarily because they damage the ability for those who can&#8217;t SEE the fuckin&#8217; things, to post on forums and blogs.  Visually-impaired persons (and the blind), have been saying that for years.<br />
      IF you&#8217;re going to include a &#8220;validation box&#8221;, you need to also put in some sort of audio version, so that those who can&#8217;t see the fuckin&#8217; thing can still post here.</p>
<p>     Somebody oughta kick you in the face twenty or thirty times, you fuckin&#8217; douchebag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133607</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133607</guid>
		<description>Someone who wants the validation box to go away so badly just may have some OTHER reason to make it go away , methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone who wants the validation box to go away so badly just may have some OTHER reason to make it go away , methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133601</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133601</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I think that is BULLSHIT! The validation box is NOT NEEDED and only makes posting a pain,  period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I think that is BULLSHIT! The validation box is NOT NEEDED and only makes posting a pain,  period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133600</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133600</guid>
		<description>That validation box is needed.  If he does away with it all of his time and some of ours will be spent reading SPAM!!!!  If more people used SpammerSkewer, 
http://spammerskewer.sourceforge.net , spam necessitating this validation box may become a thing of the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That validation box is needed.  If he does away with it all of his time and some of ours will be spent reading SPAM!!!!  If more people used SpammerSkewer,<br />
<a href="http://spammerskewer.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://spammerskewer.sourceforge.net</a> , spam necessitating this validation box may become a thing of the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133598</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133598</guid>
		<description>Not surprised here with the results of the study.
We knew all along that sales of recorded music rose when massive sharing started, fiert though blank cassettes and then blank cds

What I would really like to see is a scientific study (to my knowledges and incredibly, never done) to prove or disprove that music copyrights actually benefit the people (fisrt) and then the creators, or is it only for the benefit of copyright holders, such a publishers and record companies) who scam the creators.

The bet is on tha copyrights only hurt the people and the creators, who mostly toll in slaverey like condition for the sake of the scammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprised here with the results of the study.<br />
We knew all along that sales of recorded music rose when massive sharing started, fiert though blank cassettes and then blank cds</p>
<p>What I would really like to see is a scientific study (to my knowledges and incredibly, never done) to prove or disprove that music copyrights actually benefit the people (fisrt) and then the creators, or is it only for the benefit of copyright holders, such a publishers and record companies) who scam the creators.</p>
<p>The bet is on tha copyrights only hurt the people and the creators, who mostly toll in slaverey like condition for the sake of the scammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133586</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133586</guid>
		<description>Jon...PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT STUPID VALIDATION BOX! Get rid of it! kr5Xp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon&#8230;PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT STUPID VALIDATION BOX! Get rid of it! kr5Xp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133585</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11303#comment-133585</guid>
		<description>This will not change anything. The cartels will still believe file sharing hurts sales and the people will still share fiules beliving the truth.. that it does not. Nothing changes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will not change anything. The cartels will still believe file sharing hurts sales and the people will still share fiules beliving the truth.. that it does not. Nothing changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
