Comments on: ‘It chills my soul’ http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11328 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11328/comment-page-1#comment-133651 Reader's Write Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:47:44 +0000 #comment-133651 Hi: Nope. 10328.jpg is Mrs S and this is Sharon. Cheers! Hi:

Nope. 10328.jpg is Mrs S and this is Sharon.

Cheers!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11328/comment-page-1#comment-133650 Reader's Write Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:29:36 +0000 #comment-133650 is that not Mr. Bs client Mrs. swartz? compare pictures http://p2pnet.net/story_images/10328.jpg __ Alter_Fritz is that not Mr. Bs client Mrs. swartz?
compare pictures
http://p2pnet.net/story_images/10328.jpg

__
Alter_Fritz

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11328/comment-page-1#comment-133635 Reader's Write Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:03:51 +0000 #comment-133635 "When the recording industry contributed to the development of downloading, they had all the tools necessary to warn both parents and their children that downloading copyright protected music was illegal, absent consent of the copyright holder or a license to do so." On this point I must differ, for various reasons. When legal advise comes from an interestested party, it is awas suspect. It is like medical advise from a snake oil pedler. Or business advise from a competitor. No one from the music industry shoud hand out free legal advise as to what copying/sharing is legal or not. This is because the industry has a vested interest in making all copying and sharing illegal as long as they think that these activities hurt their bottom line. Additionally any explanation that copying is illegal is contradictory to plain sight evidence, such as the sale of blank cassettes, blank disks, radios with cassetes recorders, the save as feature in computers, etc, none of which has any warning as to what is legal use and what is illegal use. Additionally any explanation that copying/sharing is illegal contradicts what the music industry and many lawyers and even countries have said, that some copying/sharing is allright. Rafael Venegas http://www.gvenegas.com “When the recording industry contributed to the development of downloading, they had all the tools necessary to warn both parents and their children that downloading copyright protected music was illegal, absent consent of the copyright holder or a license to do so.”

On this point I must differ, for various reasons.

When legal advise comes from an interestested party, it is awas suspect. It is like medical advise from a snake oil pedler. Or business advise from a competitor.

No one from the music industry shoud hand out free legal advise as to what copying/sharing is legal or not. This is because the industry has a vested interest in making all copying and sharing illegal as long as they think that these activities hurt their bottom line.

Additionally any explanation that copying is illegal is contradictory to plain sight evidence, such as the sale of blank cassettes, blank disks, radios with cassetes recorders, the save as feature in computers, etc, none of which has any warning as to what is legal use and what is illegal use.

Additionally any explanation that copying/sharing is illegal contradicts what the music industry and many lawyers and even countries have said, that some copying/sharing is allright.

Rafael Venegas
http://www.gvenegas.com

]]>