This is like saying standing in the middle of traffic decreases your risk of being run over instead of increasing it. Obviously, it helps to train drivers to watch out for pedestrians and dodge them, therefore, the chances of being hit go down.

Macrovision is desperately trying to justify their existance.

There is no way the various businesses will ever cooperate to create “transparent, interoperable and reasonable DRM,” if such a thing could even be possible.

Thought I was just paranoid. Or, maybe I took it out of context.

Cope.

I can forgive Microsoft, because Microsoft was made a bitch to the cartels. But this Macrovision – their only activity was pushing C.R.A.P. from Day One!

db

Could it be like every other person who wants DRM, he has a vested interest in its continue use? Could it be that he thinks he can sell his particular DRM as the DRM that is universal, so he makes money off of everything? Hmmm, I wonder.

Once again it can be pointed out that companies and those who represent them can only be viewed as and expected to do what is in their own best interest.

That includes Jobs who is against DRM but must use it anyway, wow that is not just a PR plee to people to keep buying. And for those IPOD fanatics, yes I own an IPOD, I do not have ITUNES installed and have never purchased from their store. I prefere to rip my music, and use software that does what I want it to do and no more.