Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
p2pnet Digests
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

The boundaries of DRM

p2pnet.net news:- John and Jane Doe (that generic couple who spend all their time being sued by vested entertainment cartel interests), buy a music / movie CD/DVD. They take it home and because it costs and arm and a leg, they make a back-up copy which they lend to a couple of friends who like it too. So they buy a CD/DVD for themselves. Or they think it’s trash and save their money.

That’s the way it should be and for the most part, that’s the way it is. But, THIS HAS TO STOP !!! - say the cartels. Because bad actors tend to assume everyone else has same mind set as them. Consequently, the corporate music and movie (and sofware) perspectives go like this:

Consumers will rob us blind if we let them. They’ll copy everything and sell it on- or offline and we’ll lose bazillions of dollars. So we have to lock products up tight and get severe laws passed making it illegal for consumers to do anything at all with their purches beyond strict confines pre-determined by us.

The result is DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) consumer control technologies and an endless stream of DRM laws which do nothing for us but everything for the corporations.

But now, slowly but surely, thanks to the Net and increasingly free communications, we customers (’consumers’ until the tide started to change) are forcing the cartels to do what they should have been doing all along: treat us like the reasonable, honest people, that we are, not potential crooks out to steal their metaphorical shorts.

DRM never has and never will be a possibility, of course. It’s a simple and incontestable fact that anything you can see or hear can, and will be, copied. And rightly so.

EMI seems to be seeing the light. But, believe others, there must be industry enforceable ‘rules’ defining exactly how people are allowed to enjoy product they’ve bought and paid for.

“Consumers can find ways to get our content anytime they want to,” says a Hollywood technology executive, quoted in the Los Angeles Times. “They get it from a friend, [or] the Internet. By putting on an onerous DRM, it’s making an honest person want to go to the illegitimate side.”

DRM is onerous by definition, and it’s one of the things which is making people resort to the p2p networks. Bad product and exorbitant prices are other reasons. However, according to the cartels, it’s not them. It’s you.

Hollywood is “cautious,” says the story, because, “Many executives believe online distribution will boost the rental category”. That’s because, “A movie purchased online for single-use viewing, or for multiple viewings in a 48-hour period, costs considerably less than a movie purchased to keep. Without digital rights management on the cheaper movie, consumers would essentially be on an honor system to delete it after one viewing or whatever terms they had agreed to.”

Honour system? Who really wants to see a movie more than twice? Three times at the outside, maybe, for 99.9% of the viewing population. And if they did watch three times, would that really represent a loss in income for the studios? Would they otherwise have paid for two more downloads, rented the DVD twice more, or gone to the cinema again?

“Without DRM, it becomes very difficult” to lay out the boundaries for consumers,” the LA Times has Chris Cookson, chief technology officer at Warner Bros stating.

“Lay out the boundaries for consumers.” Think about what that says and what it implies.

Meanwhile, what to do about people who upgrade their computers or video players?

“Some studios favor finding a way to let consumers move their previously purchased movie from device to device,” says the story, giving credence to the cartel idea what we need permission to do so.

“Others believe each upgrade represents a sales opportunity for the same content that was on the older device.”

And that’s the crux of it.

Slashdot Slashdot it!

Also See:
seeing the light - EMI still pondering DRM, February 9, 2007
Los Angeles Times - Hollywood Weighs Copyright Protections, February 9, 2007

If your Net access is blocked by government restrictions, try Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk Centre for International Studies. Go here for the official download, here for the p2pnet download, and here for details. And if you’re Chinese and you’re looking for a way to access independent Internet news sources, try Freegate, the DIT program written to help Chinese citizens circumvent web site blocking outside of China. Download it here.


rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php | | And use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site


Tired of being treated like a criminal? They depend on you, not the other way around. Don’t buy their ‘product’. Do bug your local politicians. Use emails, snail-mail, phone calls, faxes, IM, stop them in the street, blog. And if you’re into organizing, organize petitions, organize demonstrations and then turn up on your local political rep’s doorstep, making sure you’ve contacted your local tv/radio station/newspaper in advance. Don’t just complain. Do something!

HOME

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
TekSavvy