Lets make the internet safe for everyone.

I know the political process sometimes seems superficial and worse. Lets make the internet safe again for everyone.

I hope they get more than just teed. Theres an archaeological dig I would like to see their remains show up at.

“Yes. You are still responsible for your actions and the harm that you have caused.”

The harm I caused? WTF?!? And settling is not enough to immunize further suing? What’s the point?

Also, their website is a piece of crap. Was it designed by college students who are paying off their debt?

And the question: “If I have Wi-Fi at home, how can you be sure it was me who did the downloading?” Isn’t answered at all!
They say “The fact that a wireless connection is involved does not mean that the individual engaging in copyright infringement cannot be identified. Cases are routinely pursued where a wireless connection is involved.”

Dear RIAA:
The question wasn’t if the individual responsible for copyrightinfringement can be identified in such a network setup, the question was how you can be sure who did it!

But yes, you are right, cases that involve wireless netconnectivity are persued;
They even get reinstated if a default judgement on wireless is challenged by a defendant.
You might want to add that to the FAQ answer. Here’s the link: http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/02/default-judgment-vacated-in-illinois.html

Thanks RIAA for your cooperation in providing objective information. How about adding a link to http://p2plawsuitssuck.com/ out of fairness?

__
Alter_Fritz

This means that the public harressment and trying in it in the court of public opinion in the sense of blabbing it all over the world has backfired.

It also looks like they now see this as another cash cow to milk as a second income. So they want to keep it going at the same time.

There’s a reason that the cd sales are dying. The cartels aren’t putting as many out to buy. Naturally this means less sales. They’ve also ceased to groom artists for the long haul, long term appeal. Now it is the formulaic song, picked by the computer to be the hit that is going out for sales. They sound so much alike that very few are as interested in music as they were in the heyday of the 60’s and 70’s.

Digital sales aren’t booming because of the high price, low quality, locked down product that no one really wants. The latest ploy of thinking of offering non-DRM for a higher price is only greed peeking out once again. DRM hasn’t stopped anything from being shared when people want to share. So they are offering to make non-DRM at a higher price while removing the cost of licensing each copy with DRM? lol. That won’t work any better than the DRM infested product has.

I hear there is a story about the dinosaurs hearing the passage of that asteroid before it hit. Is it true the sky is falling I wonder?

For myself, it isn’t a problem. There is nothing on the market today I want to hear coming from the major labels. They’ve lost touch with my tastes in music. It makes it far easier just not to purchase or even want their product. They won’t have to worry about me downloading it. They couldn’t give it to me for free. Maybe that’s the root cause of their proclaimed lackluster sales. Piracy is just an easy drum to beat.

I think it is the RIAA that needs education, especially in the fields of (a) copyright law, (b) morality, (c) business administration, and (d) common courtesy.

Anyone who takes their lessons on any of these subjects from the RIAA is going to be seriously misled.

I hope the universities will see through this obvious ploy to increase the RIAA’s stream of easy settlement revenue, and will assist their students in finding out what their true legal rights are.

Go to http://www.voipbuster.com/en/index.html
In the Your phone number: filed, put 001+areacode+telephone number of your most ruthless, hated attorney, judge, congress critter, etc.

In the Destination phone number: field enter the following

0019132348181

or

0019132348182

Now click the call button. It costs nothing to do this, and it will probably make interesting conversation between the two. Just do it from a proxy.
It would be funny if their whole extortion center was busy with these types of calls.

Filing a frivolous lawsuit is a crime – threatening to do so is not.