<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Blockbuster buy Movielink?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11496/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11496</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11496/comment-page-1#comment-134517</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134517</guid>
		<description>Notice the LAST sentance....Movielink has quietly peddled films online since 2002, with little success.

WITH LITTLE SUCCESS!  That just said it all.

Movielink has been at it a while...as have been a lot of other &quot;legal&quot; download sites....but most have very small incomes....so what makes blockbuster think it can do any better? 

Just because you have the name Blockbuster, is no guarantee that you will be successful......just ask the folks that ran the &quot;legal&quot; version of NAPSTER! 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the LAST sentance&#8230;.Movielink has quietly peddled films online since 2002, with little success.</p>
<p>WITH LITTLE SUCCESS!  That just said it all.</p>
<p>Movielink has been at it a while&#8230;as have been a lot of other &#8220;legal&#8221; download sites&#8230;.but most have very small incomes&#8230;.so what makes blockbuster think it can do any better? </p>
<p>Just because you have the name Blockbuster, is no guarantee that you will be successful&#8230;&#8230;just ask the folks that ran the &#8220;legal&#8221; version of NAPSTER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


