Comments on: Connecticut social-sites bill http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11617 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:22 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11617/comment-page-1#comment-135202 Reader's Write Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:55:30 +0000 #comment-135202 This law is essentially dead in the water. Unless the website is based in the small state of Connecticut it has no problems. I don't know many social networking sites that are based there. This law is essentially dead in the water. Unless the website is based in the small state of Connecticut it has no problems. I don’t know many social networking sites that are based there.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11617/comment-page-1#comment-135177 Reader's Write Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:06:10 +0000 #comment-135177 Not only will they find drivers licenses but home addresses as well. This proposed solution is no solution at all. It presents more headaches than it takes care of. If I were Myspace I would be considering offshore servers and prehaps a corporation headquarters change to some other country. I don't think moving states would help. Not only will they find drivers licenses but home addresses as well.

This proposed solution is no solution at all. It presents more headaches than it takes care of. If I were Myspace I would be considering offshore servers and prehaps a corporation headquarters change to some other country. I don’t think moving states would help.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11617/comment-page-1#comment-135145 Reader's Write Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:55:25 +0000 #comment-135145 to identify themselves to those sites to identify themselves to those sites

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11617/comment-page-1#comment-135143 Reader's Write Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:18:18 +0000 #comment-135143 This would effectively destroy social networking sites in the areas covered by the legislation. This is another example of government putting its nose in where it doesn't belong. The free market's solutions are almost always the best solutions. MySpace should find ways to minimize this, not a Senator. Will we allow ANYTHING to pass legislation just because the words "protecting children" are attached? This would effectively destroy social networking sites in the areas covered by the legislation.

This is another example of government putting its nose in where it doesn’t belong. The free market’s solutions are almost always the best solutions. MySpace should find ways to minimize this, not a Senator.

Will we allow ANYTHING to pass legislation just because the words “protecting children” are attached?

]]>