Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Debbie beats the RIAA. Again.

p2pnet.net news:- Oklahoma mother Debbie Foster has beaten the Big 4 music cartel’s RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America).

For the second time.

The RIAA, “acted in bad faith in bringing the lawsuit against Debbie Foster,” said her lawyer, Marilyn D. Barringer-Thomson, and the Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG enforcer abandoned the case.

Foster, however, didn’t do the same and became the “prevailing party” under the Copyright Act, meaning she was entitled to her “reasonable” attorneys’ fees. These were $55,000 (and counting), and the judge ruled she can also supplement her request.

Hand over the relevant documents, the RIAA was asked by Barringer-Thomson a year ago. But its out-source lawyer, Holmes Robert & Owens’ Richard Gabriel (right), refused to do so. That’s now over, however. He’s been given an order by the judge:

Deliver the documents to Barringer-Thomson by March 26.

“The order requires the RIAA to produce the attorneys’ time sheets, billing statements, billing records, and costs and expense records,” says Recording Industry vs The People, going on:

“The Court reviewed authorities holding that an opponent’s attorneys fees are a relevant factor in determining the reasonableness of attorneys fees, quoting a United States Supreme Court case which held that ‘a party cannot litigate tenaciously and then be heard to complain about the time necessarily spent by his opponent in response’.”

“Will this cause the RIAA to rethink its litigation strategy?” – wondered Ars Technica’s Eric Bangeman.

“Probably. The industry cartel will have to tread carefully with any secondary infringement claims now that there is case law that owning an Internet account used for infringement does not automatically make the owner liable for said infringement. Attorney Ray Beckerman told Ars that he believes there are huge implications from this opinion. ‘It sends a message to the RIAA… that there are consequences to this ‘driftnet’ litigation strategy,’ Beckerman said.”

“If the RIAA’s going to go around
bringing cases against people, it’s going to have to pay the price when it loses,” he told p2pnet.

Slashdot Slashdot it! Also See:
acted in bad faithRIAA times out in p2p case, February 27, 2007
Recording Industry vs The PeopleRIAA Ordered To Turn Over Its Attorneys Billing Records in Capitol v. Foster, 15, 2007
Ars TechnicaVictim of RIAA “driftnet” awarded attorneys’ fees, February 7, 2007

If your Net access is blocked by government restrictions, try Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at thIs the end (of the Net) nigh?zze University of Toronto’s Munk Centre for International Studies. Go here for the official download, here for the p2pnet download, and here for details. And if you’re Chinese and you’re looking for a way to access independent Internet news sources, try Freegate, the DIT program written to help Chinese citizens circumvent web site blocking outside of China. Download it here.


rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php | | And use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site

Tired of being treated like a criminal? They depend on you, not the other way around. Don’t buy their ‘product’. Do bug your local politicians. Use emails, snail-mail, phone calls, faxes, IM, stop them in the street, blog. And if you’re into organizing, organize petitions, organize demonstrations and then turn up on your local political rep’s doorstep, making sure you’ve contacted your local tv/radio station/newspaper in advance. Don’t just complain. Do something!

HOME

5 Responses to “Debbie beats the RIAA. Again.”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    JC, It’s ABOUT TIME!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    But, will those who have no souls (RIAA) continue to drag out this matter in the courts, a-la “SCO vs. IBM” ?

    Damn right this case sets precedent; if RIAA does what most of those who have souls consider moral, then they (RIAA) will (*finally*!) be hit, over & over & over again, in that one major area which hold most dear – their (RIAA’s) pocketbook.

    Yes, Reader’s Write, it IS about time ;->

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    ” But, will those who have no souls (RIAA) continue to drag out this matter in the courts, a-la “SCO vs. IBM” ? ”

    Yes. they will, and are.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Good for her!
    Thank goodness there’s some common sense in
    the courts.
    RIAA is wounded and bleeding…and has a black eye.
    It’s sunny outside again.

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    I guess the money sack didn’t make it to this judge…

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®