Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA wasted move in Foster case

p2pnet.net news:- The Big 4 music cartel could be its own victim in the latest installment to the Debbie Foster versus the RIAA saga.

Oklahoma mother Foster is trouncing the RIAA, the Big 4 enforcer, and its hired-hand law firm, Holmes Robert & Owens.

Now the cartel’s RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has, “moved for ‘reconsideration’ of the Court’s order determining that Ms. Foster is entitled to an award of her reasonable attorneys fees, the RIAA’s motion for permission to file a reply brief – responding to Ms. Foster’s opposition papers – has been granted,” says Recording Industry vs The People’s Ray Beckerman.

“Judge Lee West gave the RIAA until March 22nd to file the additional papers.”

What does this mean in practical terms?

“The judge is letting the RIAA spend even more money on legal fees,” Beckerman told p2pnet, going on:

A reply brief, in the context of a reconsideration motion, is superfluous. The only permissible basis for a reconsideration is establishing to the judge that he or she overlooked something.

If you haven’t made a case for that in your initial papers, you haven’t made it. The sole basis for reply papers is to respond to new matter in the opposition papers; nothing defendant said in her opposition papers, or that the RIAA is saying in its reply papers, is of any moment to the judge on a reconsideration motion.

Bottom line, the RIAA’s lawyers are once again playing their client for a sucker.

The HR&O lawyer in this case is Richard Gabriel (above right).

Also See:
trouncing the Big 4Debbie beats the RIAA. Again., March 16, 2007
Recording Industry vs The PeopleRIAA Gets Permission to File Reply Brief in Support of “Reconsideration” Motion, March 16, 2007

Slashdot Slashdot it!

If your Net access is blocked by government restrictions, try Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at thIs the end (of the Net) nigh?zze University of Toronto’s Munk Centre for International Studies. Go here for the official download, here for the p2pnet download, and here for details. And if you’re Chinese and you’re looking for a way to access independent Internet news sources, try Freegate, the DIT program written to help Chinese citizens circumvent web site blocking outside of China. Download it here.


rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php | | And use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site

Tired of being treated like a criminal? They depend on you, not the other way around. Don’t buy their ‘product’. Do bug your local politicians. Use emails, snail-mail, phone calls, faxes, IM, stop them in the street, blog. And if you’re into organizing, organize petitions, organize demonstrations and then turn up on your local political rep’s doorstep, making sure you’ve contacted your local tv/radio station/newspaper in advance. Don’t just complain. Do something!

HOME

6 Responses to “RIAA wasted move in Foster case”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    I’m beginning to wonder just whose side the xxAA’s lawyers are really on.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    the greedy money side they are on.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    You know, I have always been thinking that that the **AAs were not stupid – that they knew exactly what they were doing.

    I had been assuming that they had all the high priced lawyers advising them on what to do in order to make the most money.

    After reading this, I’m not too sure now.

    Could it be that the **AAs have just all been hoodwinked by their own lawyers?

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    They’re LAWYERS for crying out loud!!! They’re on their OWN “greedy money side” just like ANY other lawyer(s). DOH!!!

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    no duhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! ya think??????????

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    we won’t take it and the courts are beginning to see it OUR way!

    My hope is for some day very soon our ‘legal system’ sees the **AAs for the crooks they are and turn on them charging them with FRIVILOUS LAW SUITS forcing them to pay back ALL the money they racketeered and extorted from people putting them completely out of business! NO MORE **AAs!!!! …wouldn’t THAT be nice?

    …AND, of course, the end of ALL DRM which it looks like is just now starting to take place with what is going on in Germany.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®