Comments on: Dear RIAA: better think again

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:19:03 +0000

Hey mom,

Wheres the spuds….

I been eaten all day none, and no mo music have I sawn.

Lasr night, the blue window was buggin sis, so I shots her.

Oh, There you is…neva mined

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:52:01 +0000

Saying this is a nice fake is giving the author way too much credit. Its a crappy fake.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:16:26 +0000

This is the biggest bunch of legal puffery and buffonery that I have ever seen. If anyone thinks this gimmick will work, you are fooling yourselves, just like when you think “it’s not stealing” when you illegally download copyrighted material.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:32:25 +0000

You still don’t get it, it’s not about downloading its about racial discrimination against white people.

Consider this point of view from a Wedding dj:

The RIAA is a racist organization who only sues white people. Hmmm sue 20 White High School kids from North Dakota…. Not Gary Indiana, Trenton NJ, Compton, Far Rockaway the highest crime area in NYC…..nope in pure white FARGO NORTH DAKOTA.

Or the university of Wisconsin with 2.7% black students….not a College that gets money from the United Negro College Fund.!

But nobody has the guts to fight them on those terms.

Then there are Tons of black people selling illegal dvd’s or hard drives full of music, on ebay and craigslist, yet they never get sued its only white 13 years olds or white college kids, being sued. Because, White people buy most of the rap and hip hop music, and if we let white people steal music like the blacks the whole rap hip hop market would collapse.

Plus, I DARE YOU, just try and get a breakdown of the lawsuits by race, age, settlement amount and ZIP CODE….the RIAA will not supply that information..WHY? Everybody else has to to show transparency in employment and corporate policy..and if they don’t they get sued…..but not the RIAA???

Jesse Jackson sued Toyota, because of “Implied Racism”, well what about turning this around and implying the RIAA will not sue black people.

I was a Professional Wedding dj, and was active in my local dj association, and i know very very few black dj’s are “legal” I know its very politically incorrect to say this but it is the best defense against the reverse racism in these lawsuits.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:20:07 +0000

Reader’s Write,

Went to Google. Put in this search term” LEDFORD LAW CORPORATION”.

Returned his web address (http://ledfordlaw.net/), address, phone, etc.

Went to whois.net. Entered ledfordlaw.net:

Domain Name………. ledfordlaw.net
Creation Date…….. 2002-10-26
Registration Date…. 2002-10-26
Expiry Date………. 2007-10-26
Organisation Name…. Ledford Law Corporation
Organisation Address. 805 West Oak Avenue
Organisation Address.
Organisation Address. Visalia
Organisation Address. 93291-6033
Organisation Address. CA
Organisation Address. UNITED STATES

Been around since 2002 or so…

Still think he’s a fake? Please, do your homework BEFORE blowing off your mouth.

Ted

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:18:10 +0000

Reader’s Write,

Went to Google. Put in this search term” LEDFORD LAW CORPORATION”.

Returned his web address (http://ledfordlaw.net/), address, phone, etc.

Went to whois.net. Entered ledfordlaw.net:

Been around since 2002 or so…

Still think he’s a fake? Please, do your homework BEFORE blowing off your mouth.

Ted

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:53:49 +0000

top law firm…. mm… remember dan quayle?

george w bush is a yale graduate and therefore an “educated individual” and yet he can’t speak english correctly, let alone write it. there goes your “educated individual” argument down the toilet.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:46:12 +0000

he might be an idiot. you’re certainly an RIAA whore.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:26:34 +0000

Clearly “Molly Morris” is a ficticious name. What decent human being would name a child that? It’s inhumane and evil and I won’t be a party to it. No sir, I don’t like it all. Not one bit!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:23:33 +0000

1. Using “insure” instead of “ensure” is not a typo in this case, the author just doesn’t know the difference.

2. Using, “Straw is will burn.” as the big impact statement is classic comedy. Glad he’s not sending emails on my behalf.

3. I fart “infinity farts” in your general direction.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:16:25 +0000

Attorneys are people?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:31:20 +0000

I think he is an idiot. He does not even understand that his client is not being sued for “downloading” music as he stated several times. His client is being sued for making copyrighted material available for distribution so others can download it.

Just another grandstanding lawyer that is more in love with hearing himself talk than doing anything right.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:34:15 +0000

Oh shut the fuck up stupid denier! Attorneys are people, and they make mistakes. Clearly you’re an idiot.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:11:39 +0000

http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filename=sony_merchant_070327NoticeDismissal

Is that fake, too?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:03:01 +0000

Well, the guy clearly states that the letter is full of typos as can be expected from an e-mail that was quickly written up – read the whole thing.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:48:55 +0000

“Straw is will burn.”?

I count dozens of grammar mistakes in this letter from the above, to the usage of “insure” rather than “ensure”, etc.

There is zero chance an educated individual wrote this error-ridden letter, let alone a top law firm. Nice fake.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:47:57 +0000

“Straw is will burn.”?

I count dozens of grammar mistakes in this letter from the above, to the usage of “insure” rather than “ensure”, etc.

There is zero chance an educated individual wrote this error-ridden letter, let alone a top law firm. Nice fake.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:12:15 +0000

When I visited their webpage <24h ago the simple counter was something in the 00180s and IIRC this paragraph wasn’t present too:

“Mr. Ledford is admitted to practice before all California Courts. Client engagements, team assignments, and trial associations in other Western States, Texas, and New England are accepted pro hac vice in association with AV-rated local counsel licensed to practice in the forum state. All services are performed consistent with the highest standards of legal ethics and all federal, state, and local rules of practice.”

seems he offers “expansions” already.

would be nice of course if their “legal SWAT-team” would take some pro hac stuff pro bono -or just for the prospect of cashing in big time once the RIAA bullies flee to the hills- for poor soccer moms that are swearing to be non pirates.

http://ledfordlaw.net/

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:50:12 +0000

I love the humorous underpinnings in this sweet letter.
Good job Merl Ledford III.
I smiled the whole time I read your letter.
You need to expand your services to others in the same boat.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:03:21 +0000

Given the offer of confidentiality, how is it that this latter is (already) public?

At any rate, I wish my general counsel was half as sharp! Plus, it makes we want to move back to California!