<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA loses in Kylee case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11787/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11787</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:18:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11787/comment-page-1#comment-136132</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-136132</guid>
		<description>The spell checker is a function of the Firefox browser, not a feature of the P2Pnet website. If you went to the RIAA website and tried to leave a comment there, the spell checker would say it was spelled wrong on that site too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spell checker is a function of the Firefox browser, not a feature of the P2Pnet website. If you went to the RIAA website and tried to leave a comment there, the spell checker would say it was spelled wrong on that site too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11787/comment-page-1#comment-136131</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-136131</guid>
		<description>One has to wonder what the RIAA is thinking about their lawyers right now.  One defeat after another and they just don&#039;t seem to get it.  I wonder if the lawyers themselves are taking the RIAA for a ride...could be.


Jon, for a P2P news site that is anti-RIAA, why does the spellchecker say the RIAA is misspelled?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One has to wonder what the RIAA is thinking about their lawyers right now.  One defeat after another and they just don&#8217;t seem to get it.  I wonder if the lawyers themselves are taking the RIAA for a ride&#8230;could be.</p>
<p>Jon, for a P2P news site that is anti-RIAA, why does the spellchecker say the RIAA is misspelled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11787/comment-page-1#comment-136124</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-136124</guid>
		<description>Well well well. The R.I.C.O. (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act (&lt;http://www.ricoact.com/&gt;) seems to have found a good use after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well well well. The R.I.C.O. (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act (&lt;http://www.ricoact.com/&gt;) seems to have found a good use after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
