<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox romps along in Europe</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137103</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137103</guid>
		<description>Alright the you say :-
France is using 33.2% but graphic says 22.3%.
UK is using 32.3% but the graphic says 18%.
Switzerland is using 31.5% but the graphic says 21.4%.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright the you say :-<br />
France is using 33.2% but graphic says 22.3%.<br />
UK is using 32.3% but the graphic says 18%.<br />
Switzerland is using 31.5% but the graphic says 21.4%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137102</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137102</guid>
		<description>Alright the you say :-
France is using 33.2% but graphic says 22.3%.
UK is using 32.3% but the graphic says 18%.
Switzerland is using 31.5% but the graphic says 21.4%.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright the you say :-<br />
France is using 33.2% but graphic says 22.3%.<br />
UK is using 32.3% but the graphic says 18%.<br />
Switzerland is using 31.5% but the graphic says 21.4%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137065</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137065</guid>
		<description>Everyone has their favorite stuff. However the article isn't about Opera.

During the late 80's M$ was running the browser wars. Doing the best it could to destroy the competition. It finally became evident that M$ had buried the competition. After that almost no development in advancing the security and features of IE occurred. IE stagnated while the spam and malware industry had a field day. Those pest industries are still having a field day with IE but it's gotten better. FF and other browsers continued to improve as they went.

In typical fashion M$ came out with IE7 finally. Their main reason for the tabbed browsing feature was it was a highly desirable feature that people were demanding and only finding in other browsers. M$ is being forced back into attempting to improve IE because of the competition. The IE browser languished without much in the line of improvements for 15-20 years.

The M$ monoculture is wearing thin at a lot of places. Between cost to relicense and the lack of basic security in the default setup, people are getting fed up with the constant hassels; so are businesses and corporations and governments. You are hearing more of this every day it seems. The M$ black suits are kept busy trying to stem the tide.

We haven't seen the end of this revolt; it's just starting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has their favorite stuff. However the article isn&#8217;t about Opera.</p>
<p>During the late 80&#8217;s M$ was running the browser wars. Doing the best it could to destroy the competition. It finally became evident that M$ had buried the competition. After that almost no development in advancing the security and features of IE occurred. IE stagnated while the spam and malware industry had a field day. Those pest industries are still having a field day with IE but it&#8217;s gotten better. FF and other browsers continued to improve as they went.</p>
<p>In typical fashion M$ came out with IE7 finally. Their main reason for the tabbed browsing feature was it was a highly desirable feature that people were demanding and only finding in other browsers. M$ is being forced back into attempting to improve IE because of the competition. The IE browser languished without much in the line of improvements for 15-20 years.</p>
<p>The M$ monoculture is wearing thin at a lot of places. Between cost to relicense and the lack of basic security in the default setup, people are getting fed up with the constant hassels; so are businesses and corporations and governments. You are hearing more of this every day it seems. The M$ black suits are kept busy trying to stem the tide.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t seen the end of this revolt; it&#8217;s just starting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137064</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137064</guid>
		<description>as long as you don't use M$ IE, any other browser is good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as long as you don&#8217;t use M$ IE, any other browser is good <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137053</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137053</guid>
		<description>opera&#62;firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opera&gt;firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137052</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11991#comment-137052</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
