Comments on: Wayne Crookes sues the Internet

By: Devora

Devora — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:17:39 +0000

LOUIS KESTENBAUM A SATMAR Chasid is being accused. WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) – A teenage girl has filed a $50 million lawsuit against a New York billionaire, saying he sexually abused her when she was 14.

Louis Kestenbaumâs attorney says the allegations are false and motivated by money. Kestenbaum is also the CEO of Fortis properties and the ODA a goverment funded organisation in the williamsburg section of Brooklyn NY

The girl, now 17, claims Louis Kestenbaum invited her to his Florida mansion in 2005 to perform a massage for $300. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims he demanded she remove her clothes, then sexually assaulted her.

The girl, her father and stepmother are seeking more than $50 million.

Joel kestenbaum the son of Louis kestenabum had no comments

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 01 May 2007 23:25:51 +0000

what a moron!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:52:54 +0000

As was mentioned, this just draws more attention. I didn’t know who Wayne Crookes was or even have an interest in him at all. Since this came up, I’ve taken a little trip out into discovery land and turned up a few things to inform me. Lawsuits such as this do nothing to hide anything; they only add more curiosity to those who had no knowledge and no interest before.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:22:34 +0000

I’m trademarking the terms “Sue” when used with “Internet” or “Net” or “teh 1nt3rwebs.”

Please send me your bank account details and I’ll remove the needed fees.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:32:23 +0000

” Newton, get over it, who cares about you or what you have to say? ”

You seem to care enough to have earned a nickname
Gachnar. Seems to me you spend nearly as much time
here as Jon .

Yes, you care a great deal.
Why ?

” It is the height of self-delusion to even place yourself in the same sentence as the other defendants. ”

Absolutely correct.
To place him in as a defendent for merely linking to
an article is rather …. delusional … one might even say
… frivolous. You’re right, gach, Jon shouldn’t be sued
for this, thanks for pointing it out.

” If this happened to a journalist who had credibility maybe someone would write a story. ”

It’s precisely this sites credibility, that make it a target
folks who have lawyers, and folks who are owned
by lawyers … wouldn’t you say ?

” If this happened to a journalist who had credibility maybe someone would write a story. ”

The point of such a broad scope of suits is to ensure
that no one can ever write a story about those with
wealth and power.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:51 +0000

Newton, get over it, who cares about you or what you have to say? It is the height of self-delusion to even place yourself in the same sentence as the other defendants. You are not a journalist, just a hack, spouting off into an echo chamber of p2p geeks who hate the RIAA and record labels. If this happened to a journalist who had credibility maybe someone would write a story.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:09:05 +0000

It may be REMOTELY possible because when early immigrants came to the US through Ellis Island they were processed so fast that names were misspelled appearing to be different. E.G: Kueffer became Keefer or Kieffer. Some even CHOSE to change the spelling of their names or their names altogether (and [some immigrants] still do this to this day)!

However, this scenario is most likely improbable.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:53:06 +0000

Yep, Crookes NEEDS to take a look at this and LEARN a few things from Crook!

Isn’t it serendipitous that BOTH are “crooks”?????????

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:09:26 +0000

Its funny I just noticed the two names sounds alike a lot ..

..anyway for those who don’t know the story read the links below and watch the video : This could happen to Wayne Crookes.

http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/14/michael-crook-settlement-apology/

http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Dear_Internet_I_m_Sorry_Michael_Crook_apology_video

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:21:01 +0000

‘Once again, all this is really doing is getting a lot more attention focused on this guy rather than hiding his critics. It’s difficult to see how that’s helpful.’

- well it makes more people talk about him, then he can sue them for libel, it’s the old you tell 2 people and they tell 2 people and… except it’s you tell 2 people, I’ll sue you, they tell 2 people I’ll sue them, …..

Wow how long before the *AA get’s in on this cash for lawsuits scam?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:06:16 +0000

sorry, didn’t saw that.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:39:59 +0000

its crookes not crook

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:30:04 +0000

from an uninformed outsider from far away over the big pond:

are the canadian crook and the “pervert list” crook in the USA that had to apologise in a video, by any chance relatives?

if so, that might could explain his behaviour from a scientific POV; it might be in their genes then.