<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellphones, Wi-Fi and your brain</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137477</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137477</guid>
		<description>and every poison is a drug.

What matters is the dose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and every poison is a drug.</p>
<p>What matters is the dose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137476</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137476</guid>
		<description>Because everyone can provide connectivity with ad-hoc WiFi, there is less and less need for ISPs, which tend to violate network neutrality when supporting private interests. Same for the Internet in general - there is less and less need for radio and TV sponsored by the government and private interests.

So, ant-WiFi and anti-Internet crusade is mounted by those interests. In case of the Internet, they censor it in the name of security of children. In case of WiFi, they invoke health as the argument.

Enemies of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because everyone can provide connectivity with ad-hoc WiFi, there is less and less need for ISPs, which tend to violate network neutrality when supporting private interests. Same for the Internet in general - there is less and less need for radio and TV sponsored by the government and private interests.</p>
<p>So, ant-WiFi and anti-Internet crusade is mounted by those interests. In case of the Internet, they censor it in the name of security of children. In case of WiFi, they invoke health as the argument.</p>
<p>Enemies of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137474</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137474</guid>
		<description>If Wi-Fi and cell phones do pose any long term health risks that would be very bad for business, so they don't...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Wi-Fi and cell phones do pose any long term health risks that would be very bad for business, so they don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137469</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064#comment-137469</guid>
		<description>i'm probably alone in thinking this but saying "high exposures to electromagnetic radiation can damage health but low exposure mightn't" is like saying "swallowing a lot of bleach will kill you but only a little mightn't"

you can disreguard that bit above but I think they might have a slight point. has anyone actually done a study into possible health effects after months and years of exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m probably alone in thinking this but saying &#8220;high exposures to electromagnetic radiation can damage health but low exposure mightn&#8217;t&#8221; is like saying &#8220;swallowing a lot of bleach will kill you but only a little mightn&#8217;t&#8221;</p>
<p>you can disreguard that bit above but I think they might have a slight point. has anyone actually done a study into possible health effects after months and years of exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
