<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellphones, Wi-Fi and your brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064/comment-page-1#comment-137477</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137477</guid>
		<description>and every poison is a drug.

What matters is the dose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and every poison is a drug.</p>
<p>What matters is the dose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064/comment-page-1#comment-137476</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137476</guid>
		<description>Because everyone can provide connectivity with ad-hoc WiFi, there is less and less need for ISPs, which tend to violate network neutrality when supporting private interests. Same for the Internet in general - there is less and less need for radio and TV sponsored by the government and private interests.

So, ant-WiFi and anti-Internet crusade is mounted by those interests. In case of the Internet, they censor it in the name of security of children. In case of WiFi, they invoke health as the argument.

Enemies of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because everyone can provide connectivity with ad-hoc WiFi, there is less and less need for ISPs, which tend to violate network neutrality when supporting private interests. Same for the Internet in general &#8211; there is less and less need for radio and TV sponsored by the government and private interests.</p>
<p>So, ant-WiFi and anti-Internet crusade is mounted by those interests. In case of the Internet, they censor it in the name of security of children. In case of WiFi, they invoke health as the argument.</p>
<p>Enemies of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064/comment-page-1#comment-137474</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137474</guid>
		<description>If Wi-Fi and cell phones do pose any long term health risks that would be very bad for business, so they don&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Wi-Fi and cell phones do pose any long term health risks that would be very bad for business, so they don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12064/comment-page-1#comment-137469</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137469</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m probably alone in thinking this but saying &quot;high exposures to electromagnetic radiation can damage health but low exposure mightn&#039;t&quot; is like saying &quot;swallowing a lot of bleach will kill you but only a little mightn&#039;t&quot;

you can disreguard that bit above but I think they might have a slight point. has anyone actually done a study into possible health effects after months and years of exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m probably alone in thinking this but saying &#8220;high exposures to electromagnetic radiation can damage health but low exposure mightn&#8217;t&#8221; is like saying &#8220;swallowing a lot of bleach will kill you but only a little mightn&#8217;t&#8221;</p>
<p>you can disreguard that bit above but I think they might have a slight point. has anyone actually done a study into possible health effects after months and years of exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
