Comments on: Labels appeal Cdn file share ruling http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1212 p2pnet.net - reader powered Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:25:05 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1212/comment-page-1#comment-1286 Reader's Write Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:08:24 +0000 #comment-1286 They expect to win on appeal with the evidence they presented the first time around? Give me a break. There was no evidence! -No proof that files shared were copyrighted works. In the words of president of Media Sentry "we weren't hired to download and listen to songs"; -They didn't present certificates of copyright to the court; -the ISP's admitted that ability to link IP to subscriber was an impossibilty; -They disn't prove that the users on kazaa were knowingly distributing files. etc etc etc etc Wish they would crawl under a rock out of sheer embarassment and wait til the Heritage Minister (aka ms. social worker who like sports) tries to screw up our copyright law in a knee jerk reaction to big business screwing up royally in court. Why must we pay for the screw up by two low rent "boutique" lawyers who specialize in trademark law? They expect to win on appeal with the evidence they presented the first time around? Give me a break. There was no evidence!

-No proof that files shared were copyrighted works. In the words of president of Media Sentry “we weren’t hired to download and listen to songs”;
-They didn’t present certificates of copyright to the court;
-the ISP’s admitted that ability to link IP to subscriber was an impossibilty;
-They disn’t prove that the users on kazaa were knowingly distributing files.

etc etc etc etc

Wish they would crawl under a rock out of sheer embarassment and wait til the Heritage Minister (aka ms. social worker who like sports) tries to screw up our copyright law in a knee jerk reaction to big business screwing up royally in court. Why must we pay for the screw up by two low rent “boutique” lawyers who specialize in trademark law?

]]>