Comments on: Wayne Crookes sues the Net: III

By: hackd » e-publishing and the law

hackd » e-publishing and the law — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:56:06 +0000

[...] [↩]And I personally saw people scribbling website addresses as fast as they could [↩]In the Wayne Crookes case, even linking was considered as defamatory, which is completely insane [↩]There was no [...]

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:03:53 +0000

Launch a countersuit against the prick. See how he likes living in a cardboard box with a mortgage.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 09 May 2007 17:12:43 +0000

n/t

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 May 2007 22:47:49 +0000

The big lie is that “linking” is being called “republishing.” It’s kind of like calling the process of telling someone about a book you read in the library “republishing.” It won’t hold up in court; it’s just too fucking ludicrous.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 May 2007 19:01:54 +0000

The suit says you refused to rmove te link. Were you actually asked to do this? How the hell is pointing to something Libel.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 08 May 2007 07:10:05 +0000

True, and yet …

A lawsuit of THIS scale is extremely costly.
Extreme even for the most wealthy individual.

The most wealthy INDIVIDUAL that is.

With corporate backing, however, a suit like this becomes
easy.

Certain … entities .. stand to gan a great deal if Mr Crookes
is successful.

I wonder who is bankrolling this … really.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 07 May 2007 16:51:09 +0000

Some people have earned their own money.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 06 May 2007 21:20:10 +0000

good question…

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 06 May 2007 16:25:42 +0000

I wonder who is bankrolling Mr. Crookes ??