<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waltzing pirates in bulky clothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curious Searcher</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181/comment-page-1#comment-142685</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Searcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-142685</guid>
		<description>Well... today&#039;s the movie&#039;s release date in theatres and I haven&#039;t found a torrent yet that hasn&#039;t been labeled a fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; today&#8217;s the movie&#8217;s release date in theatres and I haven&#8217;t found a torrent yet that hasn&#8217;t been labeled a fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181/comment-page-1#comment-138072</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138072</guid>
		<description>Once a film is released in the U.S.A., it will show up on computer networks.  Once this happens, Canadians eager to see the films but not allowed to do so legally will only have the option of downloading them from one of the computer networks or waiting for the release.  This law will hurt theatre owners instead of thwarting &quot;piracy.&quot;  Anyone here know of a good concealable camcorder that produces great results from a theatre screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a film is released in the U.S.A., it will show up on computer networks.  Once this happens, Canadians eager to see the films but not allowed to do so legally will only have the option of downloading them from one of the computer networks or waiting for the release.  This law will hurt theatre owners instead of thwarting &#8220;piracy.&#8221;  Anyone here know of a good concealable camcorder that produces great results from a theatre screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181/comment-page-1#comment-138069</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138069</guid>
		<description>___ waltz in film, and waltz out again ___

My piece is meant to be more about lop-sided reporting and the effects it can have than whether or not there should be a law against filming flicks with camcorders.

Cheers!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>___ waltz in film, and waltz out again ___</p>
<p>My piece is meant to be more about lop-sided reporting and the effects it can have than whether or not there should be a law against filming flicks with camcorders.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12181/comment-page-1#comment-138065</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138065</guid>
		<description>So you think it is OK for people to waltz in film, and waltz out again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you think it is OK for people to waltz in film, and waltz out again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


