<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colonel Sanders vs Tracy Daly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12186/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12186</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:36:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12186/comment-page-1#comment-138326</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Christmas Pud&quot;:  damn.  So, in England, &quot;rubbers&quot; are galoshes, &quot;knocking someone up&quot; is pounding on their door in the morning, and &quot;garters&quot; are men&#039;s suspenders -- and &quot;Christmas pud&quot; is a yuletide delicacy.
    That tears it: Everybody in england must be gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Christmas Pud&#8221;:  damn.  So, in England, &#8220;rubbers&#8221; are galoshes, &#8220;knocking someone up&#8221; is pounding on their door in the morning, and &#8220;garters&#8221; are men&#8217;s suspenders &#8212; and &#8220;Christmas pud&#8221; is a yuletide delicacy.<br />
    That tears it: Everybody in england must be gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12186/comment-page-1#comment-138082</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138082</guid>
		<description>Otherwise, you may very well have the Wal-Mart gestapo on your case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otherwise, you may very well have the Wal-Mart gestapo on your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12186/comment-page-1#comment-138080</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138080</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t blame KFC *much* for trademarking &quot;Family Feast&quot;. Heck, if the idiots at the Tradmark Office are willing to grant the trademark why not? It&#039;s the fact that the Trademark office GRANTS THESE ASININE TRADEMARKS that is the real problem. If they granted trademark status to a specific logo that could be easily distinguished from normal text that contained the words &quot;Family Feast&quot; that would be one thing, but to grant trademark protection to THE PHRASE ITSELF is inexcusable. The Trademark Office is out of control, or under the control of big corps. Either way it needs to start using some common sense, if not perhaps a Lethal Injection(TM) is in order...    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t blame KFC *much* for trademarking &#8220;Family Feast&#8221;. Heck, if the idiots at the Tradmark Office are willing to grant the trademark why not? It&#8217;s the fact that the Trademark office GRANTS THESE ASININE TRADEMARKS that is the real problem. If they granted trademark status to a specific logo that could be easily distinguished from normal text that contained the words &#8220;Family Feast&#8221; that would be one thing, but to grant trademark protection to THE PHRASE ITSELF is inexcusable. The Trademark Office is out of control, or under the control of big corps. Either way it needs to start using some common sense, if not perhaps a Lethal Injection(TM) is in order&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
