<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoundExchange backs down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred Singlewide</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-321015</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Singlewide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-321015</guid>
		<description>This really opened my eyes even though it was written last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really opened my eyes even though it was written last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-138725</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 05:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138725</guid>
		<description>Just a bunch of greedy corporate pigs.
How many times have you gone into a music store and seen the same ole&#039; humdrum music that has been throughly worn out for the last thirty years or so and being repackaged a million times ?

The whole concept of copyright and patent issues in the United are so outdated and arcane that everytime any kind of broadcast that plays and pays royalties on unlistenable drivel  it amounts to extortion.

It&#039;s always the same ole&#039; bullshit alternative and rap cds the entertainment cartels loving shoving down your kid&#039;s throats and corrupting their young impressionable minds throughly with perverted vile lyrics that leave little to the imagination.

How would most people feel if there was a huge backlash to this kind of vile filth that the the religious right and other concerned morality groups decided to encourage parents to confiscate their kid&#039;s rap and alternative cds and uncermoniously threw them on a pile AND BURN THEM ?

It would resemble the book burning incident in nazi germany on may 10 1933 when Adolf hitler decreed that all artisically suspect books and manuscripts were to be set ablaze.

The RIAA are a bunch of shameless corporate pigs that represent a dying business model in which they will shamelessly sell your kids any kind perverted filth in which they have the arrogance and the audacity to ask for money everytime the perverted filth is played in a broadcast outlet and medium.

I can go to LIVE365.COM and they even have broadcast stations that  are involved in satan worship and they also have stations that are satanic and play death metal.

Hey royality rates are the least of their worries.

How would you people like a rerun of Tipper Gore and the video broadcast witchhunt of the  1980s ?

They have people in congress talking about reviving the so called &quot;fairness doctrine&quot; and it has a lot of people in conservative talk show circuit worried about censorship.

Rap and alternative cds are next.

Then the morality police will have satan based websites run off the internet  and internet radio stations that promote satanism will be also targeted.

How about Air america ?

They bash George Bush everyday.

I am Quite sure there are people in congress that  are actively scheming in how they can pass a anti internet porn and smut law that could pass judicial and legislative muster and run more than a few porn sites of the internet.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a bunch of greedy corporate pigs.<br />
How many times have you gone into a music store and seen the same ole&#8217; humdrum music that has been throughly worn out for the last thirty years or so and being repackaged a million times ?</p>
<p>The whole concept of copyright and patent issues in the United are so outdated and arcane that everytime any kind of broadcast that plays and pays royalties on unlistenable drivel  it amounts to extortion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always the same ole&#8217; bullshit alternative and rap cds the entertainment cartels loving shoving down your kid&#8217;s throats and corrupting their young impressionable minds throughly with perverted vile lyrics that leave little to the imagination.</p>
<p>How would most people feel if there was a huge backlash to this kind of vile filth that the the religious right and other concerned morality groups decided to encourage parents to confiscate their kid&#8217;s rap and alternative cds and uncermoniously threw them on a pile AND BURN THEM ?</p>
<p>It would resemble the book burning incident in nazi germany on may 10 1933 when Adolf hitler decreed that all artisically suspect books and manuscripts were to be set ablaze.</p>
<p>The RIAA are a bunch of shameless corporate pigs that represent a dying business model in which they will shamelessly sell your kids any kind perverted filth in which they have the arrogance and the audacity to ask for money everytime the perverted filth is played in a broadcast outlet and medium.</p>
<p>I can go to LIVE365.COM and they even have broadcast stations that  are involved in satan worship and they also have stations that are satanic and play death metal.</p>
<p>Hey royality rates are the least of their worries.</p>
<p>How would you people like a rerun of Tipper Gore and the video broadcast witchhunt of the  1980s ?</p>
<p>They have people in congress talking about reviving the so called &#8220;fairness doctrine&#8221; and it has a lot of people in conservative talk show circuit worried about censorship.</p>
<p>Rap and alternative cds are next.</p>
<p>Then the morality police will have satan based websites run off the internet  and internet radio stations that promote satanism will be also targeted.</p>
<p>How about Air america ?</p>
<p>They bash George Bush everyday.</p>
<p>I am Quite sure there are people in congress that  are actively scheming in how they can pass a anti internet porn and smut law that could pass judicial and legislative muster and run more than a few porn sites of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-138724</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 05:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138724</guid>
		<description>Just a bunch of greedy corporate pigs.
How many times have you gone into a music store and seen the same ole&#039; humdrum music that has been throughly worn out for the last thirty years or so and being repackaged a million times ?

The whole concept of copyright and patent issues in the United are so outdated and arcane that everytime any kind of broadcast that plays and pays royalties on unlistenable drivel  it amounts to extortion.

It&#039;s always the same ole&#039; bullshit alternative and rap cds the entertainment cartels loving shoving down your kid&#039;s throats and corrupting their young impressionable minds throughly with perverted vile lyrics that leave little to the imagination.

How would most people feel if there was a huge backlash to this kind of vile filth that the the religious right and other concerned morality groups decided to encourage parents to confiscate their kid&#039;s rap and alternative cds and uncermoniously threw them on a pile AND BURN THEM ?

It would resemble the book burning incident in nazi germany on may 10 1933 when Adolf hitler decreed that all artisically suspect books and manuscripts were to be set ablaze.

The RIAA are a bunch of shameless corporate pigs that represent a dying business model in which they will shamelessly sell your kids any kind perverted filth in which they have the arrogance and the audacity to ask for money everytime the perverted filth is played in a broadcast outlet and medium.

I can go to LIVE365.COM and they even have broadcast stations that  are involved is satan worship and they also have stations that are satanic and play death metal.

Hey royality rates are the least of their worries.

How would you people like a rerun of Tipper Gore and the broadcast witchhunt of the  1980s ?

They have people in congress talking about reviving the so called &quot;fairness doctrine&quot; and it has a lot of people in conservative talk show circuit worried about censorship.

Rap and alternative cds are next.

Then the morality police will have satan based websites and internet radio stations that promote satanism will be also targeted.

How about Air america ?

They bash George Bush everyday.

I am Quite sure there are people in congress that  are actively scheming in how they can pass a anti internet porn and smut law that could pass judicial and legislative muster and run more than a few porn sites of the internet.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a bunch of greedy corporate pigs.<br />
How many times have you gone into a music store and seen the same ole&#8217; humdrum music that has been throughly worn out for the last thirty years or so and being repackaged a million times ?</p>
<p>The whole concept of copyright and patent issues in the United are so outdated and arcane that everytime any kind of broadcast that plays and pays royalties on unlistenable drivel  it amounts to extortion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always the same ole&#8217; bullshit alternative and rap cds the entertainment cartels loving shoving down your kid&#8217;s throats and corrupting their young impressionable minds throughly with perverted vile lyrics that leave little to the imagination.</p>
<p>How would most people feel if there was a huge backlash to this kind of vile filth that the the religious right and other concerned morality groups decided to encourage parents to confiscate their kid&#8217;s rap and alternative cds and uncermoniously threw them on a pile AND BURN THEM ?</p>
<p>It would resemble the book burning incident in nazi germany on may 10 1933 when Adolf hitler decreed that all artisically suspect books and manuscripts were to be set ablaze.</p>
<p>The RIAA are a bunch of shameless corporate pigs that represent a dying business model in which they will shamelessly sell your kids any kind perverted filth in which they have the arrogance and the audacity to ask for money everytime the perverted filth is played in a broadcast outlet and medium.</p>
<p>I can go to LIVE365.COM and they even have broadcast stations that  are involved is satan worship and they also have stations that are satanic and play death metal.</p>
<p>Hey royality rates are the least of their worries.</p>
<p>How would you people like a rerun of Tipper Gore and the broadcast witchhunt of the  1980s ?</p>
<p>They have people in congress talking about reviving the so called &#8220;fairness doctrine&#8221; and it has a lot of people in conservative talk show circuit worried about censorship.</p>
<p>Rap and alternative cds are next.</p>
<p>Then the morality police will have satan based websites and internet radio stations that promote satanism will be also targeted.</p>
<p>How about Air america ?</p>
<p>They bash George Bush everyday.</p>
<p>I am Quite sure there are people in congress that  are actively scheming in how they can pass a anti internet porn and smut law that could pass judicial and legislative muster and run more than a few porn sites of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-138676</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138676</guid>
		<description>The webcasters&#039; response to the &quot;offer they can&#039;t refuse&quot; has been predictable and unanimous in rejection of SoundExchange&#039;s terms.  John Simson will be able to claim that their good faith has been scorned, but this isn&#039;t going to fool anyone except those befuddled souls who were already on their side.

It is interesting to note, in spite of all that noise Simson made about &quot;reaching out&quot; to webcasters sinch HR 2060 was introduced, that David Oxenford, the attorney for the small commercial webcasters, viewed the SoundExchange &quot;offer&quot; as a &quot;starting point&quot; for negotiations, but felt that &quot;negotiation by press release&quot; was not the way to proceed.  It sounds for all the world as if Simson and SoundExchange were more interested in telling people they were reaching out than they were in actually reaching out.  In other words, they still expect people to believe what they say they do rather than believe they actually do it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The webcasters&#8217; response to the &#8220;offer they can&#8217;t refuse&#8221; has been predictable and unanimous in rejection of SoundExchange&#8217;s terms.  John Simson will be able to claim that their good faith has been scorned, but this isn&#8217;t going to fool anyone except those befuddled souls who were already on their side.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note, in spite of all that noise Simson made about &#8220;reaching out&#8221; to webcasters sinch HR 2060 was introduced, that David Oxenford, the attorney for the small commercial webcasters, viewed the SoundExchange &#8220;offer&#8221; as a &#8220;starting point&#8221; for negotiations, but felt that &#8220;negotiation by press release&#8221; was not the way to proceed.  It sounds for all the world as if Simson and SoundExchange were more interested in telling people they were reaching out than they were in actually reaching out.  In other words, they still expect people to believe what they say they do rather than believe they actually do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-138666</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138666</guid>
		<description>&quot;Simpson has been vigorously defending the new rates, claiming the corporate music industry...desperately needs them to survive.&quot;

Perhaps the corporate music industry&#039;s time has come. Time to get your tickets punched boys. C&#039;ya, wouldn&#039;t wanna be ya, @$$holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Simpson has been vigorously defending the new rates, claiming the corporate music industry&#8230;desperately needs them to survive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps the corporate music industry&#8217;s time has come. Time to get your tickets punched boys. C&#8217;ya, wouldn&#8217;t wanna be ya, @$$holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12305/comment-page-1#comment-138664</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138664</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t whatever percentage of take that a webcaster pay SoundExchange for using music be a function of how much SoundExchange music is used?

After all there is a lot of independent (not represented by SoundExchange) and public domain and ownership unclaimed music and recordings  out  there. 

It seems to me that Copyright Office royalty board and SoundExchange have found simplicity where there is none.

Rafael Venegas
gvenegas.com



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t whatever percentage of take that a webcaster pay SoundExchange for using music be a function of how much SoundExchange music is used?</p>
<p>After all there is a lot of independent (not represented by SoundExchange) and public domain and ownership unclaimed music and recordings  out  there. </p>
<p>It seems to me that Copyright Office royalty board and SoundExchange have found simplicity where there is none.</p>
<p>Rafael Venegas<br />
gvenegas.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


