<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAfee adamant! p2pnet stays Red!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397/comment-page-1#comment-139161</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139161</guid>
		<description>IMHO, it works just as good as Mcafee, and it does not libel an innocent website owner.  If you do not like the ads, then give Jon some money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, it works just as good as Mcafee, and it does not libel an innocent website owner.  If you do not like the ads, then give Jon some money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397/comment-page-1#comment-139121</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139121</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hopefully everything will get sorted out.&quot;

There&#039;s nothing to sort out, Jay. What McAfee does or doesn&#039;t do has no effect on me or p2pnet. The company&#039;s holier than thou attitude rankles, and that&#039;s about the extent of it.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hopefully everything will get sorted out.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing to sort out, Jay. What McAfee does or doesn&#8217;t do has no effect on me or p2pnet. The company&#8217;s holier than thou attitude rankles, and that&#8217;s about the extent of it.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397/comment-page-1#comment-139117</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139117</guid>
		<description>I can understand McAfee&#039;s postion with the links.  I have never clicked on any of them cause I wouldnt use any of those programs.  Its a shame to classify p2pnet as red cause there are no popups, never had any problems with scripts/virus&#039; trying to install from the site.  

Ive never really liked the ads that are on the site but I can understand that Jon needs the support.  Its a bummer with the whole Adsense thing and that other more legit companies around the world wouldnt want to advertise a bit on this site seeing the large amount of hits it gets.

The only thing I use McAfee for is Virus and Firewall.  And the newest version just blows.  I liked the older one better.  Im tempted next to time switch to another.  

Hopefully everything will get sorted out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand McAfee&#8217;s postion with the links.  I have never clicked on any of them cause I wouldnt use any of those programs.  Its a shame to classify p2pnet as red cause there are no popups, never had any problems with scripts/virus&#8217; trying to install from the site.  </p>
<p>Ive never really liked the ads that are on the site but I can understand that Jon needs the support.  Its a bummer with the whole Adsense thing and that other more legit companies around the world wouldnt want to advertise a bit on this site seeing the large amount of hits it gets.</p>
<p>The only thing I use McAfee for is Virus and Firewall.  And the newest version just blows.  I liked the older one better.  Im tempted next to time switch to another.  </p>
<p>Hopefully everything will get sorted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12397/comment-page-1#comment-139107</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139107</guid>
		<description>In my long-standing personal experience, McAfee has been &quot;RED for Bad&quot; (ever) since 1996. They (McAfee) were not apologetic back then (1996), and I see nothing (and I *do* mean NOTHING) has changed, since over a decade ago.

Nothing shall change McAfee&#039;s corporate opinion other than a very-great shock to their corporate system. And when that shock occurs, it shall be LONG overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my long-standing personal experience, McAfee has been &#8220;RED for Bad&#8221; (ever) since 1996. They (McAfee) were not apologetic back then (1996), and I see nothing (and I *do* mean NOTHING) has changed, since over a decade ago.</p>
<p>Nothing shall change McAfee&#8217;s corporate opinion other than a very-great shock to their corporate system. And when that shock occurs, it shall be LONG overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


