Comments on: RIAA lies and disinformation: II http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:12:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Justin http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-145058 Justin Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:01:49 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-145058 Any time sugar ;) Any time sugar ;)

]]> By: Jon http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-144726 Jon Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:39:23 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-144726 <p>Well reasoned, articulate comment posts are always such a pleasure to read ;p</p> <p>Cheers!</p> Well reasoned, articulate comment posts are always such a pleasure to read ;p

Cheers!

]]> By: Justin DeRosa http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-144720 Justin DeRosa Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:15:01 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-144720 How can I be "completely wrong" and also right about the illegality of downloading copywritten works? You dumbasses never fail to impress. See one of the perks about writing for a real publication like the Mercury news is access to important resources, like lawyers. A lawyer was consulted about the accuracy of this article before publication, which he approved. But you know Jon I'm glad you went to such a credible source on this issue, a P2P cartel mob boss is exactly who I would ask "Is my music stealing legal?" This Schultz guy sounds like a total douchebag; notice how he didn't address jack shit except for the writer? That's called ad hominen, argument against the man. Fuck him. Listen though: Fuck both the RIAA and the self righteous P2P assholes on the other end of the spectrum. You're just as bad as the RIAA in that you distort the law to your tastes just as much as they do, and you're three times as self-congratulating. I almost can't get over how delusional you all are about what you're doing. You're not some fucking revolutionaries for getting free music and movies. Let me lay it out for you how capitalism works: people exchange services for money, with which they can purchase others' services. Copyrights are put in place to make sure that people are paid for their services, and so others don't use the result of their efforts for their own personal gain. You guys would be the first group, the ones who get services without paying for them. For some reason you idiots have tricked yourselves into believing that what you're doing is not only legal, but beneficial to the industries you steal from. "INCREASED DISTRIBUTION LOL!" Shut the fuck up, it's distribution they aren't being compensated for. No one is "forcing" you to pay for the product of music, as no baker is forcing you to pay for bread. If you want bread, you can buy it. If you want music, you can buy it. If you don't want to pay for either you can steal them, but don't give yourself a fucking pat on the back for it. How can I be “completely wrong” and also right about the illegality of downloading copywritten works? You dumbasses never fail to impress. See one of the perks about writing for a real publication like the Mercury news is access to important resources, like lawyers. A lawyer was consulted about the accuracy of this article before publication, which he approved. But you know Jon I’m glad you went to such a credible source on this issue, a P2P cartel mob boss is exactly who I would ask “Is my music stealing legal?” This Schultz guy sounds like a total douchebag; notice how he didn’t address jack shit except for the writer? That’s called ad hominen, argument against the man. Fuck him.

Listen though: Fuck both the RIAA and the self righteous P2P assholes on the other end of the spectrum. You’re just as bad as the RIAA in that you distort the law to your tastes just as much as they do, and you’re three times as self-congratulating.

I almost can’t get over how delusional you all are about what you’re doing. You’re not some fucking revolutionaries for getting free music and movies. Let me lay it out for you how capitalism works: people exchange services for money, with which they can purchase others’ services. Copyrights are put in place to make sure that people are paid for their services, and so others don’t use the result of their efforts for their own personal gain. You guys would be the first group, the ones who get services without paying for them. For some reason you idiots have tricked yourselves into believing that what you’re doing is not only legal, but beneficial to the industries you steal from. “INCREASED DISTRIBUTION LOL!” Shut the fuck up, it’s distribution they aren’t being compensated for.

No one is “forcing” you to pay for the product of music, as no baker is forcing you to pay for bread. If you want bread, you can buy it. If you want music, you can buy it. If you don’t want to pay for either you can steal them, but don’t give yourself a fucking pat on the back for it.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-139306 Reader's Write Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:49:53 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12450#comment-139306 Hes completly wrong... P2P isn't legal to download copyrighted works, that much is true. However its also not legal for the riaa to bring a lawsuit against someone for doing so. (ref us copyrightlaw sec 1008) Hes completly wrong…

P2P isn’t legal to download copyrighted works, that much is true. However its also not legal for the riaa to bring a lawsuit against someone for doing so. (ref us copyrightlaw sec 1008)

]]>