<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In defence of the RIAA</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139502</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139502</guid>
		<description>" Does "our" mean "the company's" or "the artist's"? Therein lies a problem. "

 If they RIAA are 'convincing' a politician they own, or
 putting the word out on a media channel they own, they
 mean 'Artists'.

 In COURT in front of a JUDGE however, they mean the corporate
 entity that actually holds the rights :)

funnay how that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Does &#8220;our&#8221; mean &#8220;the company&#8217;s&#8221; or &#8220;the artist&#8217;s&#8221;? Therein lies a problem. &#8221;</p>
<p> If they RIAA are &#8216;convincing&#8217; a politician they own, or<br />
 putting the word out on a media channel they own, they<br />
 mean &#8216;Artists&#8217;.</p>
<p> In COURT in front of a JUDGE however, they mean the corporate<br />
 entity that actually holds the rights <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>funnay how that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139500</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139500</guid>
		<description>Where to start? How does one go about defending the indefensible? The RIAA's methods are a two legged stool of hostility and greed that is not doing it's job of serving artist needs and cannot stand up without totally artificial support. No amount of lawsuits and lobbying will prop up the dinosaur. They are setting themselves up for a hard fall. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where to start? How does one go about defending the indefensible? The RIAA&#8217;s methods are a two legged stool of hostility and greed that is not doing it&#8217;s job of serving artist needs and cannot stand up without totally artificial support. No amount of lawsuits and lobbying will prop up the dinosaur. They are setting themselves up for a hard fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139497</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139497</guid>
		<description>"our litigation against consumers for illegally downloading our copyrights"

How do you download a copyright?
Does "our" mean "the company's" or "the artist's"?  Therein lies a problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;our litigation against consumers for illegally downloading our copyrights&#8221;</p>
<p>How do you download a copyright?<br />
Does &#8220;our&#8221; mean &#8220;the company&#8217;s&#8221; or &#8220;the artist&#8217;s&#8221;?  Therein lies a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139482</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12521#comment-139482</guid>
		<description>because the CUSTOMER is suing the BUSINESS OWNER


not the business suing the customer.


if the dry cleaner was suing the customer because he brought in a duplicate pair of pants... maybe they would have a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because the CUSTOMER is suing the BUSINESS OWNER</p>
<p>not the business suing the customer.</p>
<p>if the dry cleaner was suing the customer because he brought in a duplicate pair of pants&#8230; maybe they would have a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
