Mozilla’s Lilly bites into Apple
p2pnet.net news view:- Apple’s Steve Jobs plans to use Microsoft’s Internet Explorer in what appears to be a complicated scheme, a component of which is ultimately designed to do good things for iPhone, due for release at the end of the month.
But Job’s views of the browser world are, “out of date” and “duopolistic”. So says Mozilla coo John Lilly.
“The big news, of course, is that Apple’s releasing Safari on Windows – and although it’s been a rough first few days for them (and will get rougher), more choices are generally good for users, and so I’m hopeful that they can work to produce a product of quality on Windows eventually,” blogs Lilly, featuring a graph which has IE with a 78% share, Firefox 15%, Safari 5%, and ‘other,’ 2%.
continuing:
We could quibble with the numbers, but close enough. It doesn’t give much credit to the large & growing number of other quality browsers that are on the scene today, and certainly doesn’t give any sophisticated understanding of the situation outside the United States, where things vary more. Close enough, though.
On the right is the graph Lily says betrays the way thatJobs, “and by extension Apple, so often looks at the world” >>>>>
Lilly goes on:
He said this: “Well we dream big. We would love for Safari’s marketshare to grow substantially. That’s what we’d love.” Aw, shucks.
Fantastic! Dream big! Imagine a world of ‘wait for it’ access to the web controlled by 2 companies – and why not just go with the 2 dominant operating system vendors in the world.
But make no mistake: this wasn’t a careless presentation, or an accidental omission of all the other browsers out there, or even a crummy marketing trick. Lots of words describe Steve & his Stevenotes, but “careless” and “accidental” do not. This is, essentially, the way they’re thinking about the problem, and shows the users they want to pick up.
There are a couple of problems, of course. The first is that this isn’t really how the world is. The second is that, irrespective of Firefox, this isn’t how the world should be.
First, it isn’t really how the world is. The meteoric rise of Wikipedia, Creative Commons, Linux and Firefox, among many other examples, shows that today’s connected world is no longer constrained by the monopolies and duopolies and cartels of yesterday’s distribution – of the publishers, studios, and OS vendors. Hundreds of millions of users, in every language around the world are now making new choices. That Apple doesn’t feel this, even within the familiar reality-distortion-field confines of Moscone Center, illustrates much of the problem.
Second, it isn’t how the world should be. Even if we could somehow put that movement back in the bottle – that a world of just Starbucks & Peets, just Wal-mart & Target, just Ford & GM – that a world of tight control from a few companies is good, it’s the wrong thing to do. It destroys participation, it destroys engagement, it destroys self-determination. And, ultimately, it wrecks the quality of the end-user experience, too. Remember (or heard about) when you had to get your phone from AT&T? Good times.
So here’s my point, to be clear: another browser being available to more people is good. I’m glad that Safari will be another option for users. (Watch for the Linux port Real Soon Now.) We’ve never ever at Mozilla said that we care about Firefox market share at the expense of our more important goal: to keep the web open and a public resource. The web belongs to people, not companies.
This world view that Steve gave a glimpse into betrays their thinking: it’s out-of-date, corporate-controlled, duopoly-oriented, not-the-web thinking. And it’s not good for the web. Which is sort of moot, I think, because I don’t think this 2 party world will really come to be.
Steve asserted Monday that Safari on Windows will overturn history, attract 100M new users, and revert the world to a 2 browser state. That remains to be seen, of course.
But don’t bet on it.
Also See:
blog – A Picture’s Worth 100M Users???, June 14, 2007
If your Net access is blocked by government restrictions, try Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk Centre for International Studies. Go here for the official download, and here for details. And if you’re Chinese and you’re looking for a way to access independent Internet news sources, try Freegate, the DIT program written to help Chinese citizens circumvent web site blocking outside of China. Download it here.
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php | | And use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site
Tired of being treated like a criminal? They depend on you, not the other way around. Don’t buy their ‘product’. Do bug your local politicians. Use emails, snail-mail, phone calls, faxes, IM, stop them in the street, blog. And if you’re into organizing, organize petitions, organize demonstrations and then turn up on your local political rep’s doorstep, making sure you’ve contacted your local tv/radio station/newspaper in advance. Don’t just complain. Do something!
July 23rd, 2007 at 10:40 pm
“Duo-polistic?”
Oh great….so in addition to people not being able to distinguish what a REAL “monopoly” is, we now get made-up terms for shock-value. That’s cute. So, if there are THREE major players in a given field, it’s a “tri-opoly?” Four is a “quadropoly?” Somebody help me here…the complete lack of intellectual content is creating a vacuum that threatens to make my brain implode!
Too much time spent on cosmetic changes and extraneous bells and whistles, and not enough spent on substantive discussion of the actual issues (beyond a reflexive and unthinking p2p-apps-are-cool-corporations-suck” screed every now and again.
Pathetic.