Comments on: RIAA fails to get student IDs

By: Monkey D. Luffy

Monkey D. Luffy — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:26:45 +0000

“The story is about a good judge doing a good job for the American people. And the last 2 posts are about how bad the judiciary is.”

If the post was about a jar of honey that happens to be floating in a sea of shit you can count on getting some comments about the shit.

By: cyberscan

cyberscan — Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:39:54 +0000

Mr. Beckerman, I can explain it. Government corruption and the people’s satisfaction with their masters is at an all time low. The people are looking for a way to express their dissatisfaction even if it is through off-topic posts. The majority of bad judges have given the few good judges a bad name. I do commend the good judges though, because they are back peddling against a torrent of corruption. In this rare instance, justice has actually prevailed.

By: Ray Beckerman

Ray Beckerman — Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:30:55 +0000

The story is about a good judge doing a good job for the American people. And the last 2 posts are about how bad the judiciary is.

Can someone explain that for me?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:05:19 +0000

Until accountability is returned to government there will not be a review of judgeships. Political back-scratching and the fear of being exposed themselves for their own wrong doings have led to a no check on judgeships meaning that often where they are not elected by the public there is no check at all.

There is a means of removing judges that are incompetent or proved to be on the take. Unfortunetly, it hasn’t been envoked in decades. That sort of tells you how our system is working. It isn’t that judges (being just as human as the rest of us) have gotten more moral and upright but that less interest is present in upsetting the feeding line at the swill trough. By no means am I saying that all judges are on the take. But you can be sure human nature hasn’t changed in the last several 100s of years so you can be positive it still exists, even if you don’t have the particular facts yourself.

Our govenment is being run by crooks that are less worried about being exposed because everyone is protecting their own backyards.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:24:21 +0000

Wer a judge rule in favor of these piece of shit up to destray our society for profit there is two possibilites:

He/She is incompetent and he/she should be dismissed at best or he /she is corrupted and he/she should go to jail like all these RIAA parasites for extortion.

By: Ray Beckerman

Ray Beckerman — Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:54:31 +0000

It is most gratifying to see a Judge deny an ex parte application like that. I.e., only the RIAA was in court. No one else — not the students, not even the university — knew about it or had a chance to say anything.

This is an example of a good judge doing his homework and actually reading the statutes, and not being impressed by pounds of paper and doubletalk.

I am very happy to see judges like Judge Kelley and Judge Garcia taking a close look, and saying to the RIAA thugs : “Wait a minute, this is still a court of law, not a schoolyard where bullies can just do whatever they want to defenseless people. We have a rule of law, here, buddy.”