<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Always-on mobile Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:42:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879/comment-page-1#comment-148865</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879#comment-148865</guid>
		<description>&quot;For example, Rogers - Canada’s sole GSM provider and therefore the only telecom company currently equipped to offer the iPhone - offers a starter data plan that provides 1.5 megabytes of data per month for $15 (each additional MB is $21). Since that is not even enough data to download a single high-resolution photograph, most consumers presumably opt for more.&quot;

That is totally incredible! 1.5 megabytes...that&#039;s nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For example, Rogers &#8211; Canada’s sole GSM provider and therefore the only telecom company currently equipped to offer the iPhone &#8211; offers a starter data plan that provides 1.5 megabytes of data per month for $15 (each additional MB is $21). Since that is not even enough data to download a single high-resolution photograph, most consumers presumably opt for more.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is totally incredible! 1.5 megabytes&#8230;that&#8217;s nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879/comment-page-1#comment-148441</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12879#comment-148441</guid>
		<description>By upping costs, companies discourage use, and are not going to recover their investment that way.

Here is a quote from Clay Shirky:

While the mobile industry has been telling us for years that internet-accessible cellphones will soon outnumber PCs, they fail to note that for internet use, measured in either hours or megabytes, the PC dwarfs the phone as a tool.

and here is the introduction of that paper:

For most of the past year, on many US airlines, those phones inserted into the middle seat have borne a label reading “Service Disconnected.” Those labels tell a simple story — people don’t like to make $40 phone calls. They tell a more complicated one as well, about the economics of connectivity and about two competing visions for access to our various networks. One of these visions is the one everyone wants — ubiquitous and convenient — and the other vision is the one we get — spotty and cobbled together.

Call the first network “perma-net,” a world where connectivity is like air, where anyone can send or receive data anytime anywhere. Call the second network “nearly-net”, an archipelago of connectivity in an ocean of disconnection. Everyone wants permanet — the providers want to provide it, the customers want to use it, and every few years, someone announces that they are going to build some version of it. The lesson of in-flight phones is that nearlynet is better aligned with the technological, economic, and social forces that help networks actually get built. The most illustrative failure of permanet is the airphone. The most spectacular was Iridium. The most expensive will be 3G. ”

http://shirky.com/writings/permanet.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By upping costs, companies discourage use, and are not going to recover their investment that way.</p>
<p>Here is a quote from Clay Shirky:</p>
<p>While the mobile industry has been telling us for years that internet-accessible cellphones will soon outnumber PCs, they fail to note that for internet use, measured in either hours or megabytes, the PC dwarfs the phone as a tool.</p>
<p>and here is the introduction of that paper:</p>
<p>For most of the past year, on many US airlines, those phones inserted into the middle seat have borne a label reading “Service Disconnected.” Those labels tell a simple story — people don’t like to make $40 phone calls. They tell a more complicated one as well, about the economics of connectivity and about two competing visions for access to our various networks. One of these visions is the one everyone wants — ubiquitous and convenient — and the other vision is the one we get — spotty and cobbled together.</p>
<p>Call the first network “perma-net,” a world where connectivity is like air, where anyone can send or receive data anytime anywhere. Call the second network “nearly-net”, an archipelago of connectivity in an ocean of disconnection. Everyone wants permanet — the providers want to provide it, the customers want to use it, and every few years, someone announces that they are going to build some version of it. The lesson of in-flight phones is that nearlynet is better aligned with the technological, economic, and social forces that help networks actually get built. The most illustrative failure of permanet is the airphone. The most spectacular was Iridium. The most expensive will be 3G. ”</p>
<p><a href="http://shirky.com/writings/permanet.html" rel="nofollow">http://shirky.com/writings/permanet.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
