Comments on: RIAA wants $543 from Michelle Santangelo

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:49:32 +0000

We also owe a vote of thanks to Jon who was posting on the RIAA lawsuits long before anyone else.

Defenitively! He is an Hero too!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:36:32 +0000

And, lest we forget it, a giant F-CK YOU to the RIAA.

You know. Just because.

By: Morg

Morg — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:08:38 +0000

We also owe a vote of thanks to Jon who was posting on the RIAA lawsuits long before anyone else.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:42:51 +0000

Well I forgot something very important. We should give a big thanks to Ray Beckerman and all the layers (we need to pull the list here) that took it against this criminals to defend the people of this country and our constitution! Clearly heros are not just in the military.

THANK YOU!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:26:50 +0000

Trying to extort 20k people cost a lot of money particularly since the law firm they hired riped them-off! I guess they were hoping that at least it will work at 50% but in reality not even 2k people paid them.

They have to sue the rest of them and they can not afford it! beside they know that isf they sue they will most likely lose.

They spend soemthing like $250 million and did not even recover $50 million. Clearly their business of suing people is not going very well. I now they are saying that it was not for the money. Ya right!

It is like the DRM scamers they cost the entertainement industry billion of dollars and law suit and give them nothing in exchange! When parasites eat each other I love it!

This is the END of the manjors folks! Finally! Good job people keep the boycott strong and Bye Bye Bye RIAA!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:46:39 +0000

Surely the RIAA can simply recover their deserved £543 by paying this massive illegal online distributors of copyrighted music £543 less. No??

Unbelievable how the courts can side with the criminals. What is the world coming to?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:18:55 +0000

Haha oh wow, you know the RIAA is in trouble when now they’re asking for $543.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:34:10 +0000

Wow. These idiots are going down in flames. It’s just a small matter of time before they withdraw their case and run home with their tail between their legs. And it will stand as proof that these stupid lawsuits have absolutely no legal precedence, and nobody should be afraid of them.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:57:25 +0000

simply dont pay a layer for 1-2 hours and they will have thre money

By: Ray Beckerman

Ray Beckerman — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:47:40 +0000

Well of course they have to make an example of her.

How dare she want to defend herself, rather than let them take a default judgment against her?