Debbie Foster wants $210K RIAA security
p2pnet news | RIAA News:- A few days ago it was reported that, in view of the RIAA’s one-month delay in paying the $68,685.00 attorneys fee award in Capitol v Foster, and its lawyers’ failure to respond to Ms Foster’s lawyer’s email, Ms Foster filed a motion for entry of judgment so that she could go ahead with judgment enforcement proceedings.
In response to that motion the RIAA submitted a statement that it had no objection to entry of judgment, and intimated that it thought there would be an automatic stay on enforcement of the judgment, and that it would ultimately file an appeal.
After seeing that, Ms Foster’s lawyer has filed a motion for the Court to require the RIAA to post $210,000 in security
to cover the past and future attorneys’ fees and costs that are expected to be incurred.”
Ray Beckerman – Recording Industry vs The People
Click the mic on the right to hear David Bannister’s p2pnetcast of this story >>>>
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
August 17th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
This moron at the 4 music industry still believe that nobody know about how obnoxious they are because unlike most of us they still watch TV for getting the news while most of us now rely mostly on internet for information. I know, The public know and I make my friend know. Wait for the next statistic about the music sale from the four major parasites! Without mentioning the worst of us ready to shoot them one by one. They are foooollll!
August 17th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
This parasites are going to appeal up to the supreme court and if the supreme court are stupid enough to side with this bag of shit. . . . No coment.
August 19th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
The supreme court now stacked with reich-wingnut corporatists, nominated to their positions by an illegal president, you mean? The SAME supreme court in which half the members have KNOWINGLY committed felonies and ethics violations by sitting in judgment of cases they have a direct financial stake in (and of course, always rule in favor of their wallets, duh)?
Gee….I wonder what would happen….