<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox: advertising thief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:08:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thepeer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-166328</link>
		<dc:creator>thepeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-166328</guid>
		<description>Launchcast is pretty good, highly customizable, free radio. As Pandora is no longer available in the UK, this is a pretty good substitute. Might be possible to make it work using the activex plugin for Firefox, I suppose - haven&#039;t tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Launchcast is pretty good, highly customizable, free radio. As Pandora is no longer available in the UK, this is a pretty good substitute. Might be possible to make it work using the activex plugin for Firefox, I suppose &#8211; haven&#8217;t tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-166178</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-166178</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;d want Yahoo or IE anything for any reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;d want Yahoo or IE anything for any reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummm</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-166087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-166087</guid>
		<description>Jeez, I&#039;ve been house sitting for a few days so I watched a few programs on cable. OMG, I changed the channel every time commercials came on. Who knew I was stealing?



P.S. After watching a while I have concluded that I would not have cable or satellite TV in my house even if THEY PAID ME! What a load of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I&#8217;ve been house sitting for a few days so I watched a few programs on cable. OMG, I changed the channel every time commercials came on. Who knew I was stealing?</p>
<p>P.S. After watching a while I have concluded that I would not have cable or satellite TV in my house even if THEY PAID ME! What a load of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165941</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165941</guid>
		<description>I was just thinking, I wonder if the people behind this ever use fast forward to pass commercials on their TV programs.  Or leave the room when the commercials are on TV.

If they do, then they are only hypocrites.

There site doesn&#039;t even have a contact address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking, I wonder if the people behind this ever use fast forward to pass commercials on their TV programs.  Or leave the room when the commercials are on TV.</p>
<p>If they do, then they are only hypocrites.</p>
<p>There site doesn&#8217;t even have a contact address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepeer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165890</link>
		<dc:creator>thepeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165890</guid>
		<description>People, 

there is an alternative to HOSTS file hacking in IE: http://www.ie7pro.com/

I rarely use IE, but there are a few services which still seem to get away with excluding everything else. Yahoo! Launchcast is one of these, and it has started running very processor-intensive ads alongside the song info. This addon (IE7 only I think) cleared that little annoyance right up. 

So maybe these idiots should block IE as well? In fact, why not block every user agent? Can&#039;t be too careful...

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, </p>
<p>there is an alternative to HOSTS file hacking in IE: <a href="http://www.ie7pro.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ie7pro.com/</a></p>
<p>I rarely use IE, but there are a few services which still seem to get away with excluding everything else. Yahoo! Launchcast is one of these, and it has started running very processor-intensive ads alongside the song info. This addon (IE7 only I think) cleared that little annoyance right up. </p>
<p>So maybe these idiots should block IE as well? In fact, why not block every user agent? Can&#8217;t be too careful&#8230;</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165880</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165880</guid>
		<description>This is cool. Kind of encouraging really. It means these system sucking, spyware installing, rip-off, spammy, bottom-feeding, scum suckers are finally starting to get the point.

And your right spam boy. We Firefox users don&#039;t want your viagra, so get the fuck off our internet, and go whine to your mummys. We don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool. Kind of encouraging really. It means these system sucking, spyware installing, rip-off, spammy, bottom-feeding, scum suckers are finally starting to get the point.</p>
<p>And your right spam boy. We Firefox users don&#8217;t want your viagra, so get the fuck off our internet, and go whine to your mummys. We don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Warner</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165844</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165844</guid>
		<description>The advertiser lost me at the &#039;hard working&#039; part.  Real hard working folks could afford more things in life if they weren&#039;t supporting the advertising welfare bums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advertiser lost me at the &#8216;hard working&#8217; part.  Real hard working folks could afford more things in life if they weren&#8217;t supporting the advertising welfare bums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165807</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165807</guid>
		<description>I use FF and don&#039;t have any extensions installed but I still manage to block ALL adservers!

http://www.everythingisnt.com/hosts.html

Works great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use FF and don&#8217;t have any extensions installed but I still manage to block ALL adservers!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.everythingisnt.com/hosts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.everythingisnt.com/hosts.html</a></p>
<p>Works great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165777</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165777</guid>
		<description>So basically, &quot;theft&quot; is now defined as &quot;any situation in which someone doesn&#039;t make as much money as he or she thinks he or she should&quot;.

Got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically, &#8220;theft&#8221; is now defined as &#8220;any situation in which someone doesn&#8217;t make as much money as he or she thinks he or she should&#8221;.</p>
<p>Got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk8rpro</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165709</link>
		<dc:creator>sk8rpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165709</guid>
		<description>I was actually wondering when something like this would get addressed someway shape or form - maybe not in the accusation of stealing, but the proclamation how much ad-blocking &quot;hurts.&quot;  Because let&#039;s face it, AdBlocker (Plus) with Filterset.G are awesome plug-ins which make it easier to block ads than ever before, for free.

Speaking of the two plugins, it&#039;s interesting to note that it&#039;s not Firefox&#039;s fault for blocking ads, heck, it&#039;s not even AdBlocker (Plus)&#039;s fault, but it&#039;s Filterset.G which has the filter with it.  And like many other people mentioned, blocking Firefox is not the solution because there are many alternatives with other browsers.

-----
In MacOS&#039;s Safari, there&#039;s PithHelmet (shareware)
In Windows, use the HOSTS file (but a bit complicated)
There&#039;s AdMuncher an executable
There&#039;s Opera, which does has a manual ad-blocker

And of course, just about every updated browser has a pop-up blocker.
-----

I find it useless to be upset about this, since in life there are more frustrating things than with computer politics. After all - just use the other alternatives in the other browsers, or like someone else mentioned use User Agent Switcher, an add-on which pretends to be a different browser.

Jon, if you have several websites which do this, let me know - I&#039;d like to be informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually wondering when something like this would get addressed someway shape or form &#8211; maybe not in the accusation of stealing, but the proclamation how much ad-blocking &#8220;hurts.&#8221;  Because let&#8217;s face it, AdBlocker (Plus) with Filterset.G are awesome plug-ins which make it easier to block ads than ever before, for free.</p>
<p>Speaking of the two plugins, it&#8217;s interesting to note that it&#8217;s not Firefox&#8217;s fault for blocking ads, heck, it&#8217;s not even AdBlocker (Plus)&#8217;s fault, but it&#8217;s Filterset.G which has the filter with it.  And like many other people mentioned, blocking Firefox is not the solution because there are many alternatives with other browsers.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
In MacOS&#8217;s Safari, there&#8217;s PithHelmet (shareware)<br />
In Windows, use the HOSTS file (but a bit complicated)<br />
There&#8217;s AdMuncher an executable<br />
There&#8217;s Opera, which does has a manual ad-blocker</p>
<p>And of course, just about every updated browser has a pop-up blocker.<br />
&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I find it useless to be upset about this, since in life there are more frustrating things than with computer politics. After all &#8211; just use the other alternatives in the other browsers, or like someone else mentioned use User Agent Switcher, an add-on which pretends to be a different browser.</p>
<p>Jon, if you have several websites which do this, let me know &#8211; I&#8217;d like to be informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Fitzpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165413</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165413</guid>
		<description>Jon builds a website.  The website consists of HTML encoding that suggests a certain display and functionality, according to open standards endorsed by the W3C and others.

I own a computer.  My computer runs a web browser that renders a website based on the HTML and based on my individual preferences.  Above all, I retain ultimate control of how my computer runs.  Basic property rights give me that power.

That&#039;s how the Internet works.

Any business model which tries to ignore the functionality of the Internet, by asking a computer owner to surrender control of his own machine, is therefore fatally flawed.  If there&#039;s one thing we, as p2pnet readers, should know by now, you don&#039;t get to call people thieves for asserting their personal rights and rejecting a bad business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon builds a website.  The website consists of HTML encoding that suggests a certain display and functionality, according to open standards endorsed by the W3C and others.</p>
<p>I own a computer.  My computer runs a web browser that renders a website based on the HTML and based on my individual preferences.  Above all, I retain ultimate control of how my computer runs.  Basic property rights give me that power.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how the Internet works.</p>
<p>Any business model which tries to ignore the functionality of the Internet, by asking a computer owner to surrender control of his own machine, is therefore fatally flawed.  If there&#8217;s one thing we, as p2pnet readers, should know by now, you don&#8217;t get to call people thieves for asserting their personal rights and rejecting a bad business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165219</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165219</guid>
		<description>When popups first started to appear online I sought out something to block them, the Proxomitron.
When I was sick to death of IE, I sought an alternative, and I have been using firefox since version 0.5. Adblock is one of reasons I have stuck with it.

Oh, and if you want to go where you want and view whatever content you like, install a plugin called &#039;User Agent Switcher&#039; and set the user agent to IE6.

Lets see this little monkey and all his friends try to stop that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When popups first started to appear online I sought out something to block them, the Proxomitron.<br />
When I was sick to death of IE, I sought an alternative, and I have been using firefox since version 0.5. Adblock is one of reasons I have stuck with it.</p>
<p>Oh, and if you want to go where you want and view whatever content you like, install a plugin called &#8216;User Agent Switcher&#8217; and set the user agent to IE6.</p>
<p>Lets see this little monkey and all his friends try to stop that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rossecorp</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165179</link>
		<dc:creator>rossecorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165179</guid>
		<description>OMG! How can I re-request all those zillions of ads I&#039;ve skipped since 1996 (I use Lynx) to compensate the poor, starving, indebted Content Creators?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! How can I re-request all those zillions of ads I&#8217;ve skipped since 1996 (I use Lynx) to compensate the poor, starving, indebted Content Creators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165177</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165177</guid>
		<description>Hehe. They&#039;re funny. They think we care. That&#039;s cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe. They&#8217;re funny. They think we care. That&#8217;s cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick H</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165118</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165118</guid>
		<description>You know, back when you had an occasional non animated on on a web page, it wasn&#039;t bad. The ads didn&#039;t eat at your system resources, the websites didn&#039;t install adware of spyware on your computer, and the internet was a grand place to browse.
Then, you had to &quot;surf&quot;. Why? Because the internet became choppy. Obnoxious popup ads began to appear, animated gif and flash images began to appear in growing numbers on single pages, the latter of which consumes large amounts of memory, slowing your browsing down, hampering you computer&#039;s multitasking abilities, and being a real pain in the arse. The minute these things started happening, the day ad companies thought they could take computer power from you, the day the decided to force such things upon you with no other options for those who weren&#039;t tech savvy, that was the day I advocated adblocking programs.

Sadly, that day came way before firefox, and possibly even before such programs evolved to be truly useful.

You say block firefox? I say block you. :) And your ads as well. Good riddance.
If I need to go to your website, I&#039;ll use opera with adblock, and have it identify itself as IE or some other browser.
Bite me.


Kudos on this article.
It really stimulated on of my pet peaves.

This is my first visit to this site, and it seems the ads on this page aren&#039;t obnoxious, nor are they flash images (but that could change from a refresh I suppose).
Its websites like this that deserve to have their ads viewed I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, back when you had an occasional non animated on on a web page, it wasn&#8217;t bad. The ads didn&#8217;t eat at your system resources, the websites didn&#8217;t install adware of spyware on your computer, and the internet was a grand place to browse.<br />
Then, you had to &#8220;surf&#8221;. Why? Because the internet became choppy. Obnoxious popup ads began to appear, animated gif and flash images began to appear in growing numbers on single pages, the latter of which consumes large amounts of memory, slowing your browsing down, hampering you computer&#8217;s multitasking abilities, and being a real pain in the arse. The minute these things started happening, the day ad companies thought they could take computer power from you, the day the decided to force such things upon you with no other options for those who weren&#8217;t tech savvy, that was the day I advocated adblocking programs.</p>
<p>Sadly, that day came way before firefox, and possibly even before such programs evolved to be truly useful.</p>
<p>You say block firefox? I say block you. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And your ads as well. Good riddance.<br />
If I need to go to your website, I&#8217;ll use opera with adblock, and have it identify itself as IE or some other browser.<br />
Bite me.</p>
<p>Kudos on this article.<br />
It really stimulated on of my pet peaves.</p>
<p>This is my first visit to this site, and it seems the ads on this page aren&#8217;t obnoxious, nor are they flash images (but that could change from a refresh I suppose).<br />
Its websites like this that deserve to have their ads viewed I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcdude</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165090</link>
		<dc:creator>kcdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165090</guid>
		<description>Lol, Congrats on your $10.82 Jon. Cheers to you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, Congrats on your $10.82 Jon. Cheers to you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165062</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165062</guid>
		<description>They have the answer in their hands, if only they switched their brains on and listened: &quot;only are FireFox users a somewhat small percentage of the internet, they actually are even smaller in terms of online spending&quot;. At risk of offending some people, independently minded people are more likely to use Firefox, and less likely to be swayed by an ad. It&#039;s precisely because there&#039;s a totally ZERO chance that I&#039;m going to be interested in Lavalife, Classmates.com or Vonage that I block the ads. I&#039;ve been on the web since about 1996, and I haven&#039;t responded to a single ad, so what exactly am I stealing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have the answer in their hands, if only they switched their brains on and listened: &#8220;only are FireFox users a somewhat small percentage of the internet, they actually are even smaller in terms of online spending&#8221;. At risk of offending some people, independently minded people are more likely to use Firefox, and less likely to be swayed by an ad. It&#8217;s precisely because there&#8217;s a totally ZERO chance that I&#8217;m going to be interested in Lavalife, Classmates.com or Vonage that I block the ads. I&#8217;ve been on the web since about 1996, and I haven&#8217;t responded to a single ad, so what exactly am I stealing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nSpectre</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165055</link>
		<dc:creator>nSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165055</guid>
		<description>For those wondering what to do with that empty hosts file:

http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those wondering what to do with that empty hosts file:</p>
<p><a href="http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/" rel="nofollow">http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165048</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165048</guid>
		<description>They can suck my ass hairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can suck my ass hairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberscan</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078/comment-page-1#comment-165033</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberscan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13078#comment-165033</guid>
		<description>Advertisement supports many a good site, and I have no problem with many types of ads.  I am also a big user of Adblockpro.  P2pnet.net is a perfect example on how to display ads.  I see these ads when I view the page.  If I am interested in the product advertised, I will click on the ad, and hopefully, Jon will see some revenue because of it.  The reason I am using FrostWire this day is due to the fact that it was advertised on Jon&#039;s website.

INTRUSIVE ads, however, are a different story.  Most people who read books will be annoyed if someone else came over and stuck a leaflet over what they were trying to read.  In fact, doing such a thing would be very rude.  This is exactly what pop up and slide down ads do.  When websites use such tactics, they get added to my block lists.  If I am not able to block the ad successfully, I will try to hack together a solution or go elsewhere.

As far as over the air TV goes, I can understand some ads.  However, most people pay an exorbitant amount of money for cable or satellite subscriptions.  Since they are already paying to view the content, there is no real reason for these channels to be saturated with ads (besides greed), and yet they are.  I have quit watching TBS and many other Turner stations simply because of their popup ads disrupting my viewing of the few good things they air.  I also hate when commercials are blasted with high volume as much as I hate someone screaming in my face.  

Other ads are simply inappropriate for children and family viewing (&quot;Smiling Bob, Cialis, Viagra, etc.).  I quit watching what little of G4 that was interesting because of the phone whore commercials.  I imagine there are many, many others who feel the same way.  The reason more and more people are blocking ads is because they are getting weary by the day of big companies shoving crap they don&#039;t need or want in their faces.  It seams that ads are becoming more intrusive by the day not to mention an invasion of privacy.  Most people also resent being spied upon, and this is another reason why they use countermeasures against ads.

Jon displays ads appropriately, and therefore, I allow them to be shown on my browser.  When people use the internet or watch TV, they are looking for a pleasant or informative experience.  When an unpleasant advertisement is show, that detracts from the user experience.  This is the main reason why people block , ignore or otherwise dispense of advertisement.  If advertising companies want to reach people, they need to make their ads more pleasant and less intrusive.  Failing that, people will use countermeasures so that they will not be subjected to unpleasant experiences.  This is common sense and simple psychology.

Advertisers and the people who display content need to accept the fact that people now have a choice on how they view entertainment and information.  I myself and many other people will refuse to buy products that are advertised intrusively.  Many of us will also use other content if we cannot get away from intrusive advertisements.  Thanks to the Internet, this other content is now much more readily available.   Again, we are the customers, and we have choice and more power to exercise out choice thank to the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisement supports many a good site, and I have no problem with many types of ads.  I am also a big user of Adblockpro.  P2pnet.net is a perfect example on how to display ads.  I see these ads when I view the page.  If I am interested in the product advertised, I will click on the ad, and hopefully, Jon will see some revenue because of it.  The reason I am using FrostWire this day is due to the fact that it was advertised on Jon&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>INTRUSIVE ads, however, are a different story.  Most people who read books will be annoyed if someone else came over and stuck a leaflet over what they were trying to read.  In fact, doing such a thing would be very rude.  This is exactly what pop up and slide down ads do.  When websites use such tactics, they get added to my block lists.  If I am not able to block the ad successfully, I will try to hack together a solution or go elsewhere.</p>
<p>As far as over the air TV goes, I can understand some ads.  However, most people pay an exorbitant amount of money for cable or satellite subscriptions.  Since they are already paying to view the content, there is no real reason for these channels to be saturated with ads (besides greed), and yet they are.  I have quit watching TBS and many other Turner stations simply because of their popup ads disrupting my viewing of the few good things they air.  I also hate when commercials are blasted with high volume as much as I hate someone screaming in my face.  </p>
<p>Other ads are simply inappropriate for children and family viewing (&#8221;Smiling Bob, Cialis, Viagra, etc.).  I quit watching what little of G4 that was interesting because of the phone whore commercials.  I imagine there are many, many others who feel the same way.  The reason more and more people are blocking ads is because they are getting weary by the day of big companies shoving crap they don&#8217;t need or want in their faces.  It seams that ads are becoming more intrusive by the day not to mention an invasion of privacy.  Most people also resent being spied upon, and this is another reason why they use countermeasures against ads.</p>
<p>Jon displays ads appropriately, and therefore, I allow them to be shown on my browser.  When people use the internet or watch TV, they are looking for a pleasant or informative experience.  When an unpleasant advertisement is show, that detracts from the user experience.  This is the main reason why people block , ignore or otherwise dispense of advertisement.  If advertising companies want to reach people, they need to make their ads more pleasant and less intrusive.  Failing that, people will use countermeasures so that they will not be subjected to unpleasant experiences.  This is common sense and simple psychology.</p>
<p>Advertisers and the people who display content need to accept the fact that people now have a choice on how they view entertainment and information.  I myself and many other people will refuse to buy products that are advertised intrusively.  Many of us will also use other content if we cannot get away from intrusive advertisements.  Thanks to the Internet, this other content is now much more readily available.   Again, we are the customers, and we have choice and more power to exercise out choice thank to the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
