Comments on: RIAA on shaky ground http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13109 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:19:04 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Dreddsnik http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13109/comment-page-1#comment-167589 Dreddsnik Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:27:47 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13109#comment-167589 " And if a user don’t want to commit illegal copyrightinfringements, he can use the filetransfercapabilites of any of the other messenger apps he uses anyway. " Also, if a user wishes to share comepletely legal files, with more of a sense of privacy, Gigatribe would work just fine. The assumption that desire for privacy = something to hide is a favorite argument of fascists, ( and the entertainment cartels ). " your stupid gigatribe will be “the next Kazza” that gets sued I will bet! " The Grokster decision leaves Gigatribe safe from lawsuit, as long as they don't use copyright infringement as an advertising point : ). ” And if a user don’t want to commit illegal copyrightinfringements, he can use the filetransfercapabilites of any of the other messenger apps he uses anyway. ”

Also, if a user wishes to share comepletely legal files, with more of a sense of privacy,
Gigatribe would work just fine.
The assumption that desire for privacy = something to hide is a favorite argument of
fascists, ( and the entertainment cartels ).

” your stupid gigatribe will be “the next Kazza” that gets sued I will bet! ”

The Grokster decision leaves Gigatribe safe from lawsuit, as long as they don’t use
copyright infringement as an advertising point : ).

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13109/comment-page-1#comment-167584 Reader's Write Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:04:49 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13109#comment-167584 to answer your rhetorical question (which is in fact nothing more that advertising for your software which you put up in regular intervalls on p2p sites with commentfuctions) what they gonna do: they will be just another participant unter false pretense like they are now with kazza and BT and all the others. That your application encrypts the datastream between its users does not help in any way. And that the exchange isn't encrypted in Kazza or those other apps isn't and wasn't the reason why the users are busted. Your software is in no way better if you intend to do copyrightinfringements. And if a user don't want to commit illegal copyrightinfringements, he can use the filetransfercapabilites of any of the other messenger apps he uses anyway. No need to use your extra software that can built yet another user(sharing)profile with its centralised server modell Once a user allows a guy he don't know personly into its personal user comunity (or however you guys call that function in your app) the user is fucked as he is with any other app. your stupid gigatribe will be "the next Kazza" that gets sued I will bet! to answer your rhetorical question (which is in fact nothing more that advertising for your software which you put up in regular intervalls on p2p sites with commentfuctions) what they gonna do:
they will be just another participant unter false pretense like they are now with kazza and BT and all the others.

That your application encrypts the datastream between its users does not help in any way.
And that the exchange isn’t encrypted in Kazza or those other apps isn’t and wasn’t the reason why the users are busted. Your software is in no way better if you intend to do copyrightinfringements.
And if a user don’t want to commit illegal copyrightinfringements, he can use the filetransfercapabilites of any of the other messenger apps he uses anyway. No need to use your extra software that can built yet another user(sharing)profile with its centralised server modell

Once a user allows a guy he don’t know personly into its personal user comunity (or however you guys call that function in your app) the user is fucked as he is with any other app.

your stupid gigatribe will be “the next Kazza” that gets sued I will bet!

]]>